Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35178732›Full record

ArticleChild: care, health and development2022

The glue that keeps everybody together: Peer support in mothers of young children with special health care needs.

Robin L Dodds, Tanis J Walch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child: care, health and development, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robin L DoddsDivision of Special Education and Counseling, California State University, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7748-0426
Tanis J WalchDepartment of Education, Health and Behavior Studies, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0557-7867
California State University Los Angeles · USUniversity of North Dakota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe first years following diagnosis may be particularly challenging for parents and peer support from other parents of children with special health care needs may buffer their stress.

methodsThis qualitative interview study sought to explore the impact of early access to parental peer support and whether it leads to positive adaptation and improved family well-being.

resultsFive mothers of young children with special health care needs from peer support organizations in two northern US states participated in interviews by telephone or Zoom. Themes of interest included professional scrutiny, going through the motions, someone who understands, learning and sharing, and one size does not fit all. Although most participants attributed positive changes in their emotional well-being to the support they received, they were wary of extending the impact of peer support to their child and family.

conclusionsImplications for practice include embedding peer support programmes in neonatal care units and children's hospitals, as well as the addition of mindfulness practices to facilitate parental adaptation to disability and promote family well-being.

Indexed as

MothersParentsChildChild, PreschoolCounselingDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornProfessional-Family RelationsQualitative Researchchildren with disabilitiesEarly Interventionparentspeer supportqualitative research methods

Identifiers

PMID35178732
PMCPMC9544897
OpenAlexW4213178075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.