Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35178678›Full record

ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2022

A Call-to-Action for Clinicians to Implement Evidence-Based Best Practices When Caring for Women with Uterine Fibroids.

Nicholas Leyland, Mathew Leonardi, Ally Murji, Sukhbir S Singh, Ayman Al-Hendy, Linda Bradley

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Diagnosis and classification of uterine fibroids.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicholas LeylandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West HSC 3 N 21, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada. leylann@mcmaster.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-3437-0723
Mathew LeonardiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West HSC 3 N 21, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Ally MurjiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sukhbir S SinghDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Newborn Care, University of Ottawa &, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Ayman Al-HendyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Linda BradleyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
McMaster University · CACleveland Clinic · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterine fibroids are common benign tumors that occur in up to 80% of women. Approximately half of the women affected experience considerable physical, psychological, and economic burdens and impact on quality of life due to symptoms such as heavy menstrual bleeding, pelvic pain, and infertility. Several medical and surgical options are available to treat uterine fibroids; however, healthcare providers may benefit from practical guidance in the development of individualized treatment plans based on a personalized approach. Medical treatments and minimally invasive procedures are generally preferred by most patients before considering more invasive, higher risk surgical interventions. In general, patient-centered, uterine-preserving procedures may be prioritized based on the patient's goals and the clinical scenario. Occasionally, hysterectomy may be the preferred treatment option for some patients who require definitive treatment. This call-to-action highlights recent challenges to patient care, including radical shifts in physician-patient interactions due to the COVID-19 pandemic and recent changes to evidence-based, clinically approved therapies. This report also reviews contemporary recommendations for women's health providers in the diagnosis and medical and surgical management of uterine fibroids. This call-to-action aims to empower healthcare providers to optimize the quality of care for women with uterine fibroids utilizing the best available evidence and best practices.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHumansLeiomyomaPatient-Centered CarePractice Guidelines as TopicQuality of Health CareQuality of LifeUterine NeoplasmsAbnormal uterine bleedingHeavy menstrual bleedingHysterectomyLeiomyomaMyomectomyUterine fibroids

Identifiers

PMID35178678
PMCPMC8853611
OpenAlexW4213309921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.