Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35178622›Full record

ReviewMedical & biological engineering & computing2022

State-of-the-art of situation recognition systems for intraoperative procedures.

D Junger, S M Frommer, O Burgert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

D JungerSchool of Informatics, Research Group Computer Assisted Medicine (CaMed), Reutlingen University, Alteburgstr. 150, 72762, Reutlingen, Germany. denise.junger@reutlingen-university.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7895-3210
S M FrommerSchool of Informatics, Research Group Computer Assisted Medicine (CaMed), Reutlingen University, Alteburgstr. 150, 72762, Reutlingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9129-1832
O BurgertSchool of Informatics, Research Group Computer Assisted Medicine (CaMed), Reutlingen University, Alteburgstr. 150, 72762, Reutlingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7118-4730

Funding

Ministry of Science, Research and Arts Baden-Württemberg and European Fund for Regional Development FEIH_KMU_1099897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the key challenges for automatic assistance is the support of actors in the operating room depending on the status of the procedure. Therefore, context information collected in the operating room is used to gain knowledge about the current situation. In literature, solutions already exist for specific use cases, but it is doubtful to what extent these approaches can be transferred to other conditions. We conducted a comprehensive literature research on existing situation recognition systems for the intraoperative area, covering 274 articles and 95 cross-references published between 2010 and 2019. We contrasted and compared 58 identified approaches based on defined aspects such as used sensor data or application area. In addition, we discussed applicability and transferability. Most of the papers focus on video data for recognizing situations within laparoscopic and cataract surgeries. Not all of the approaches can be used online for real-time recognition. Using different methods, good results with recognition accuracies above 90% could be achieved. Overall, transferability is less addressed. The applicability of approaches to other circumstances seems to be possible to a limited extent. Future research should place a stronger focus on adaptability. The literature review shows differences within existing approaches for situation recognition and outlines research trends. Applicability and transferability to other conditions are less addressed in current work.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyOperating RoomsApplicabilityOperating roomSituation awarenessSituation recognitionTransferability

Identifiers

PMID35178622
PMCPMC8933302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.