ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2022
Surgical strategies for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing Surgical Strategies and Prognostic Outcomes in Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Case Report: Delayed intra-abdominal hemorrhage in a patient with a duodenal stump tumor after Billroth II gastrectomy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Toosendanin induces ferroptosis in gastrointestinal stromal tumor cells through the regulation of the NCOA4 ferritinophagy pathway: implications for tumor proliferation, migration, and invasion.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- An additional gastrojejunostomy may reduce the incidence of moderate and severe delayed gastric emptying after distal segmental duodenectomy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Advances of endoscopic and surgical management in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDuodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. For localized or potentially resectable GISTs, surgery is the first choice. But the important and complex anatomical structure adjacent to the duodenum makes surgical management for duodenal GISTs challenging and few comprehensive surgical strategies have been described. This study aims to provide new comprehensive surgical strategies for duodenal GISTs by summarizing the surgical approaches and outcomes of duodenal GISTs in different locations in our center in the past 11 years.
methodsInformation from patients who underwent surgical resection for duodenal GISTs at our facility during the past 11 years was retrospectively analyzed.
resultsNinety-two patients have received surgical procedures in the facility. Twenty-three, 31, 3, and 35 patients underwent wedge resection, segmental resection, pancreatic head-preserving duodenectomy, and pancreaticoduodenectomy, respectively. The mean operative times were 212.6 (150-270), 260 (180-370), 323 (300-350), and 354.9 (290-490) min; the mean blood loss was 226.1 (100-400), 303.2 (100-600), 500 (400-600), and 582.9 (200-1300) ml, respectively. R0 margins were obtained in 21, 29, 3, and 32 patients, respectively.
conclusionsFor duodenal GISTs without invasion of the ampulla of Vater or the pancreatic head, a limited resection (such as wedge resection, segmental resection, or pancreatic head-preserving duodenectomy) is feasible. For duodenal GISTs with an invasion of the ampulla of Vater or the pancreatic head, a pancreaticoduodenectomy is still necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35178596What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.