Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35178455›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2022

Comparison of Different Machine Learning Models in Prediction of Postirradiation Recurrence in Prostate Carcinoma Patients.

Mladen Marinkovic, Marina Popovic, Suzana Stojanovic-Rundic, Milos Nikolic, Milena Cavic, Dusica Gavrilovic, Dusan Teodorovic, Nenad Mitrovic, Ljiljana Mijatovic Teodorovic

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mladen MarinkovicDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinic for Radiation Oncology and Diagnostics, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8437-3493
Marina PopovicDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7627-453X
Suzana Stojanovic-RundicDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinic for Radiation Oncology and Diagnostics, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8680-4920
Milos NikolicFaculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5892-8248
Milena CavicDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7604-9295
Dusica GavrilovicData Center, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2368-683X
Dusan TeodorovicFaculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7535-2727
Nenad MitrovicFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9296-2669
Ljiljana Mijatovic TeodorovicDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7930-1222
Oncology Institute of Vojvodina · RSUniversity of Belgrade · RSSerbian Academy of Sciences and Arts · RSUniversity of Kragujevac · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After primary treatment of localized prostate carcinoma (PC), up to a third of patients have disease recurrence. Different predictive models have already been used either for initial stratification of PC patients or to predict disease recurrence. Recently, artificial intelligence has been introduced in the diagnosis and management of PC with a potential to revolutionize this field. The aim of this study was to analyze machine learning (ML) classifiers in order to predict disease progression in the moment of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) elevation during follow-up. The study cohort consisted of 109 PC patients treated with external beam radiotherapy alone or in combination with androgen deprivation therapy. We developed and evaluated the performance of two ML algorithms based on artificial neural networks (ANN) and naïve Bayes (NB). Of all patients, 72.5% was randomly selected for a training set while the remaining patients were used for testing of the models. The presence/absence of disease progression was defined as the output variable. The input variables for models were conducted from the univariate analysis preformed among two groups of patients in the training set. They included two pretreatment variables (UICC stage and Gleason's score risk group) and five posttreatment variables (nadir PSA, time to nadir PSA, PSA doubling time, PSA velocity, and PSA in the moment of disease reevaluation). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and predictive accuracy was calculated to test the models' performance. The results showed that specificity was similar for both models, while NB achieved better sensitivity then ANN (100.0% versus 94.4%). The ANN showed an accuracy of 93.3%, and the matching for NB model was 96.7%. In this study, ML classifiers have shown potential for application in routine clinical practice during follow-up when disease progression was suspected.

Indexed as

CarcinomaProstatic NeoplasmsAndrogen AntagonistsArtificial IntelligenceBayes TheoremDisease ProgressionHumansMachine LearningMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstateProstate-Specific AntigenAndrogen AntagonistsProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID35178455
PMCPMC8844388
OpenAlexW4210852853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.