Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35178437›Full record

ArticlemHealth2022

Patient clinical documentation in telehealth environment: are we collecting appropriate and sufficient information for best practice?

Shannon H Houser, Cathy A Flite, Susan L Foster, Thomas J Hunt, Angela Morey, Miland N Palmer, Jennifer Peterson, Roberta Darnez Pope, Linda Sorensen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mHealth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Telemedicine documentation in neurology and telestroke: a global scoping review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Shannon H HouserDepartment of Health Services Administration, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Cathy A FliteDepartment of Health Services Administration & Policy, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Susan L FosterPrivacy Compliance Educator, HIPAA Privacy Office, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Thomas J HuntHealth Informatics Department, School of Health Professions, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Angela MoreyCollege of Health Sciences & Professions, Interdisciplinary Healthcare, University of North Georgia, Dahlonega, GA, USA.
Miland N PalmerHealth Administrative Services, Weber State University, Ogden, UT, USA.
Jennifer PetersonDepartment of Health Sciences, Health Informatics and Management Program, Illinois State University, Normal, IL, USA.
Roberta Darnez PopeHealth Information Management Program, Western Kentucky University, 1906 College Heights Blvd., Academic Complex, Bowling Green, KY, USA.
Linda SorensenHealth Information Management & Allied Health Departments, College of Health Professions, AHIMA Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer, Davenport University, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
American Health Information Management Association · USElectronic Privacy Information Center · USIllinois State University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USTemple University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of North Georgia · USWeber State University · USWestern Kentucky University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of telehealth for patient visits grew rapidly and served an important role as a valuable and necessary resource. Although clinical documentation is critical for telehealth patient visits, there is limited information about how healthcare facilities manage telehealth patient visit documentation, technology used for telehealth visits, and challenges encountered with telehealth patient visit documentation. This study aimed to assess the use of telehealth during the pandemic, the quality of clinical documentation in telehealth practice and to identify challenges and issues encountered with telehealth patient visits in order to develop a strategy for best practices for telehealth documentation and data management.

methodsData were collected for this cross-sectional study in January-February 2021 via a self-designed survey of administrators/managers from physicians' offices and mental health facilities. Survey questions included four categories: health organization demographic information; telehealth visits; clinical documentation for telehealth visit; and challenges and barriers related to telehealth documentation technology use.

resultsOf 76 respondents, more than half (62%) of the healthcare facilities started using telehealth for patient visits within one year of the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, with 94% of respondents indicating an increased use of telehealth for patient visits since the pandemic. The most common types of telehealth patient care provided during the pandemic included pediatrics, primary care, cardiology, and women's health. The most consistent data documentation of telehealth visits included: date of service, patient identification number, communication methods, patient informed consent, diagnosis and impression, evaluation results, and recommendations. The telehealth visit data was most commonly used for patient care and clinical practice, billing and reimbursement, quality improvement and patient satisfaction, and administrative planning. The top barriers to telehealth use by the healthcare professionals included patient challenges with telehealth services, such as inequities in quality of technology, lack of patient understanding, and lack of patient satisfaction; this was followed by frustration with constant updates of telehealth guidelines and procedures, understanding required telehealth documentation for reimbursement purposes, payer denial for telehealth visits, and legal and risk issues.

conclusionsFindings from this study can assist government entities, policymakers, and healthcare organizations in developing and advocating best practices in telehealth usage and clinical documentation improvement strategies.

Indexed as

data documentationhealth information and technologyTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID35178437
PMCPMC8800202
OpenAlexW3214091712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.