Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35178408›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2021

Visual Function is Gradually Restored During Retina Regeneration in Adult Zebrafish.

Juliane Hammer, Paul Röppenack, Sarah Yousuf, Christian Schnabel, Anke Weber, Daniela Zöller, Edmund Koch, Stefan Hans, Michael Brand

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Mechanisms and therapeutic insights from zebrafish models of wound healing.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Microglia response and function in a chronic model of photoreceptor damage.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cell-Based Therapies: Strategies for Regeneration.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023
    Review
  12. The regeneration-responsive elementFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juliane HammerCRTD-Center for Regenerative Therapies at TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Paul RöppenackCRTD-Center for Regenerative Therapies at TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Sarah YousufCRTD-Center for Regenerative Therapies at TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Christian SchnabelClinical Sensoring and Monitoring, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Anke WeberCRTD-Center for Regenerative Therapies at TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Daniela ZöllerCRTD-Center for Regenerative Therapies at TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Edmund KochClinical Sensoring and Monitoring, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Stefan HansCRTD-Center for Regenerative Therapies at TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Michael BrandCRTD-Center for Regenerative Therapies at TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
TU Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In comparison to mammals, zebrafish are able to regenerate many organs and tissues, including the central nervous system (CNS). Within the CNS-derived neural retina, light lesions result in a loss of photoreceptors and the subsequent activation of Müller glia, the retinal stem cells. Müller glia-derived progenitors differentiate and eventually restore the anatomical tissue architecture within 4 weeks. However, little is known about how light lesions impair vision functionally, as well as how and to what extent visual function is restored during the course of regeneration, in particular in adult animals. Here, we applied quantitative behavioral assays to assess restoration of visual function during homeostasis and regeneration in adult zebrafish. We developed a novel vision-dependent social preference test, and show that vision is massively impaired early after lesion, but is restored to pre-lesion levels within 7 days after lesion. Furthermore, we employed a quantitative optokinetic response assay with different degrees of difficulty, similar to vision tests in humans. We found that vision for easy conditions with high contrast and low level of detail, as well as color vision, was restored around 7-10 days post lesion. Vision under more demanding conditions, with low contrast and high level of detail, was regained only later from 14 days post lesion onwards. Taken together, we conclude that vision based on contrast sensitivity, spatial resolution and the perception of colors is restored after light lesion in adult zebrafish in a gradual manner.

Indexed as

functional recoveryoptical coherence tomographyoptokinetic responseregenerationretinasocial preference testvisually-mediated behaviorzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID35178408
PMCPMC8844564
OpenAlexW4210706579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.