Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35178354›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2022

A Novel Propidium Monoazide-Based PCR Assay Can Measure Viable Uropathogenic

Albert S Lee, Olivia K Lamanna, Kenji Ishida, Elaise Hill, Andrew Nguyen, Michael H Hsieh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Pilot Study to Detect ViableInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Rapid molecular phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility test forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Albert S LeeDivision of Pediatric Urology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Olivia K LamannaSheikh Zayed Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Kenji IshidaSheikh Zayed Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Elaise HillSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.
Andrew NguyenSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.
Michael H HsiehDivision of Pediatric Urology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Children's National · USGeorge Washington University · US

Funding

Therapeutic Exploitation of IPSE, a Urogenital Parasite-Derived Host Modulatory Protein, for Bladder Hypersensitivity SyndromesR01DK113504 · NIDDK · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HSIEH, MICHAEL HARRISON · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
Cancer Biology Training Program (CBTP)T32CA247756 · NCI · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, NORMAN H, SETO, EDWARD · 2020 to 2024
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA247756NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK113504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolymerase chain reaction (PCR) is an important means by which to study the urine microbiome and is emerging as possible alternative to urine cultures to identify pathogens that cause urinary tract infection (UTI). However, PCR is limited by its inability to differentiate DNA originating from viable, metabolically active versus non-viable, inactive bacteria. This drawback has led to concerns that urobiome studies and PCR-based diagnosis of UTI are confounded by the presence of relic DNA from non-viable bacteria in urine. Propidium monoazide (PMA) dye can penetrate cells with compromised cell membranes and covalently bind to DNA, rendering it inaccessible to amplification by PCR. Although PMA has been shown to differentiate between non-viable and viable bacteria in various settings, its effectiveness in urine has not been previously studied. We sought to investigate the ability of PMA to differentiate between viable and non-viable bacteria in urine.

methodsVarying amounts of viable or non-viable uropathogenic

resultsPMA's efficiency in excluding DNA signal from non-viable bacteria was significantly higher in bacterial samples in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, dC

conclusionWe have successfully developed PMA-based PCR methods for amplifying DNA from live bacteria in urine. Our results suggest that non-PMA bound DNA from live bacteria can be present in urine, even after antibiotic treatment. This indicates that viable but non-culturable

Indexed as

Uropathogenic Escherichia coliAnimalsAzidesDNA, BacterialHumansMiceMicrobial ViabilityPolymerase Chain ReactionPropidiumReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionAzidesDNA, BacterialPropidiumpropidium monoazidemicrobiomenon-culturable bacteriapropidium monoaziderelic DNAurinary tract infectionurineurobiomeviability

Identifiers

PMID35178354
PMCPMC8844370
OpenAlexW4225985848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.