ArticleCureus2022
Predictors and Perceptions of Healthcare Workers Regarding Vaccines Safety in the Initial Phase of COVID-19 Vaccination Drive in Western Part of India: A Regression Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A narrative review of four South Asian countries.Frontiers in public health · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 vaccination was launched in a phased manner by the government of India prioritizing healthcare workers. This study assessed the perception of healthcare workers regarding COVID-19 vaccination. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted among healthcare workers vaccinated at a tertiary care center of southern Rajasthan. Logistic regression analysis was used to note the association of perception regarding vaccine safety and other variables. Results Out of 3,102, 56.8% were male, and the majority (73.7%) were in the age range of 20-35 years. Out of the total, 80.7% and 73.2% of subjects perceived the vaccine as safe and effective, respectively. The perception regarding the timing of rolling out of vaccine and readiness for COVID-19 appropriate behavior after vaccination was statistically significant (p<0.001). The commonest undesirable effect following vaccination was pain at the injection site. Most of the subjects did not report undesirable effects following vaccination. Logistic regression analysis showed that the involvement in the direct care of COVID-19 patients (OR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.29, 1.94), the experience of COVID-19 infection in the past (OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.50, 0.91), the timing of the rollout of vaccine (OR: 3.60; 95% CI: 3.24, 4.10) showed a significant association with perception of the safety of COVID-19 vaccine. Conclusions The vaccine was perceived safe and effective by healthcare workers and reported minimal undesirable effects. The COVID-19 vaccine safety is also dependent on the past COVID-19 infection, involvement in patient care, and time of rollout of the vaccine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.