Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35178092›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2022

Influence of Periodontitis, Implant, and Prosthesis Characteristics on the Peri-Implant Status: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Ioanna Papalou, Panagiota Vagia, Ahmet Cakir, Henri Tenenbaum, Olivier Huck, Jean-Luc Davideau

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03841656 (Influence of Periodontal Care Response on Implant Treatment Outcomes at Long-term), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03841656 unknown statusnot on this map

Influence of Periodontal Care Response on Implant Treatment Outcomes at Long-term

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceRan2019 to 2022Enrolled200ConditionsPeriodontitisArmsPARORISKIMPLANT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ioanna PapalouDepartment of Periodontology, Dental Faculty, University of Strasbourg, 8 Rue Sainte-Elisabeth, Strasbourg 67000, France.
Panagiota VagiaDepartment of Periodontology, Dental Faculty, University of Strasbourg, 8 Rue Sainte-Elisabeth, Strasbourg 67000, France.
Ahmet CakirDepartment of Periodontology, Dental Faculty, University of Strasbourg, 8 Rue Sainte-Elisabeth, Strasbourg 67000, France.
Henri TenenbaumDepartment of Periodontology, Dental Faculty, University of Strasbourg, 8 Rue Sainte-Elisabeth, Strasbourg 67000, France.
Olivier HuckDepartment of Periodontology, Dental Faculty, University of Strasbourg, 8 Rue Sainte-Elisabeth, Strasbourg 67000, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7988-2290
Jean-Luc DavideauDepartment of Periodontology, Dental Faculty, University of Strasbourg, 8 Rue Sainte-Elisabeth, Strasbourg 67000, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7336-5930

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe association between peri-implant diseases and the periodontal, implant, and prosthesis characteristics has been characterized in various ways. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the link between the peri-implant and periodontal status and the influence of implant and prosthesis parameters during implant follow-up. MATERIALS AND

methodsOne hundred and seven patients with a total of 310 implants that had at least one year of function who were attending periodontal and implant maintenance at a university clinic setting were included in this cross-sectional study. The demographic, periodontal, peri-implant tissue, implant, and prosthesis parameters were recorded. A pocket depth > 4 mm with bleeding on probing defined periodontal/peri-implant soft tissue diseased sites. Analyses were performed at the patient and implant levels using univariable and multivariable mixed regression analysis.

resultsThe mean implant follow-up was 7.22 years. At the patient level, the bleeding on probing and pocket depth measurements were more pronounced around the implant than around the teeth. The opposite was observed for plaque and the clinical attachment levels. At the implant level, multivariable analysis showed that the periodontal and corresponding peri-implant tissue parameters, such as diseased sites, were closely related. The implant location, bone level, and number were selectively associated with the implant bone level, while cemented retention and emergence restoration profile influenced the implant pocket depth.

conclusionsThe present study suggested that clinical peri-implant and periodontal soft tissue statuses were different, which could be a consequence of the initial implant and prosthesis healing process. However, during implant follow-up, the peri-implant parameters were predominantly associated with their corresponding periodontal parameters regardless of an association with the implant and prosthesis characteristics. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03841656.

Identifiers

PMID35178092
PMCPMC8843979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.