ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Interpretable Short-Term Electrical Load Forecasting Scheme Using Cubist.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Daily peak load forecasting (DPLF) and total daily load forecasting (TDLF) are essential for optimal power system operation from one day to one week later. This study develops a Cubist-based incremental learning model to perform accurate and interpretable DPLF and TDLF. To this end, we employ time-series cross-validation to effectively reflect recent electrical load trends and patterns when constructing the model. We also analyze variable importance to identify the most crucial factors in the Cubist model. In the experiments, we used two publicly available building datasets and three educational building cluster datasets. The results showed that the proposed model yielded averages of 7.77 and 10.06 in mean absolute percentage error and coefficient of variation of the root mean square error, respectively. We also confirmed that temperature and holiday information are significant external factors, and electrical loads one day and one week ago are significant internal factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.