Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35178070›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021

A Random Regression Model Based on a Single-Step Method for Improving the Genomic Prediction Accuracy of Residual Feed Intake in Pigs.

Ye Wang, Chenguang Diao, Huimin Kang, Wenjie Hao, Raphael Mrode, Junhai Chen, Jianfeng Liu, Lei Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ye WangNational Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Chenguang DiaoNational Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Huimin KangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Design and Precise Breeding, School of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, China.
Wenjie HaoBest Genetic Breeding Farm, Inner Mongolia, China.
Raphael MrodeAnimal Biosciences, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Junhai ChenShenzhen Kingsino Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Jianfeng LiuNational Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Lei ZhouNational Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Residual feed intake (RFI) is considered as a measurement of feed efficiency, which is greatly related to the growth performance in pigs. Daily feeding records can be obtained from automatic feeders. In general, RFI is usually calculated from the total measurement records during the whole test period. This measurement cannot reflect genetic changes in different growth periods during the test. A random regression model (RRM) provides a method to model such type of longitudinal data. To improve the accuracy of genetic prediction for RFI, the RRM and regular animal models were applied in this study, and their prediction performances were compared. Both traditional pedigree-based relationship matrix (

Indexed as

animal modelgenomic predictionpigsrandom regression modelresidual feed intake

Identifiers

PMID35178070
PMCPMC8843929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.