Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35177976›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2022

Functional Assessment of Cerebral Artery Stenosis by Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio: A Pilot Study.

Kangmo Huang, Weihe Yao, Juan Du, Fang Wang, Yunfei Han, Yunxiao Chang, Rui Liu, Ruidong Ye, Wusheng Zhu, Shengxian Tu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Angiography‑based quantitative flow ratio for functional assessment of intracranial atherosclerotic disease.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kangmo HuangDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Weihe YaoDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Juan DuDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Fang WangDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Yunfei HanDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Yunxiao ChangBiomedical Instrument Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Rui LiuDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Ruidong YeDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Wusheng ZhuDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Shengxian TuBiomedical Instrument Institute, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Xinfeng LiuDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing attention has been paid to the hemodynamic evaluation of cerebral arterial stenosis. We aimed to demonstrate the performance of angiography-based quantitative flow ratio (QFR) to assess hemodynamic alterations caused by luminal stenoses, using invasive fractional pressure ratios (FPRs) as a reference standard.

methodsBetween March 2013 and December 2019, 29 patients undergoing the pressure gradient measurement of cerebral atherosclerosis were retrospectively enrolled. Wire-based FPR was defined by the arterial pressure distal to the stenotic lesion (Pd) to proximal (Pa) pressure ratios (Pd/Pa). FPR < 0.70 or FPR < 0.75 was assumed as hemodynamically significant stenosis. The new method of computing QFR from a single angiographic view, i.e., the Murray law-based QFR, was applied to the interrogated vessel. An artificial intelligence algorithm was developed to realize the automatic delineation of vascular contour.

resultsFractional pressure ratio and QFR were assessed in 38 vessels from 29 patients. Excellent correlation and agreement were observed between QFR and FPR [

conclusionComputational QFR from a single angiographic view achieved comparable results to the wire-based FPR. The excellent diagnostic performance and repeatability empower QFR with high feasibility in the functional assessment of cerebral arterial stenosis.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecerebral arterial stenosisfractional flow reservehemodynamicsquantitative flow ratio

Identifiers

PMID35177976
PMCPMC8845469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.