Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35177836›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2022

A comparison of experimental assays and analytical methods for genome-wide identification of active enhancers.

Li Yao, Jin Liang, Abdullah Ozer, Alden King-Yung Leung, John T Lis, Haiyuan Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Direct roles of long non-coding RNAs in transcription activation.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Li YaoDepartment of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2827-8824
Jin LiangWeill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Abdullah OzerDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6861-2853
Alden King-Yung LeungDepartment of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
John T LisDepartment of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. jonhlis@cornell.edu.
Haiyuan YuDepartment of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. haiyuan.yu@cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7597-6049

Funding

Structure, Function, and Dynamics of Macro-molecular Complexes that Execute and Regulate Genome FunctionRM1GM139738 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI Thomas George Wade Graham, Steven Zvi Josefowicz · 2021 to 2026
$14.4M
Identification and Functional Validation of Human Infertility AllelesR01HD082568 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI SCHIMENTI, JOHN C · 2015 to 2024
$6.0M
Enhancer-based Immune and Beta Cell Dysregulation Underlying T1D RiskR01DK127778 · NIDDK · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI EGLI, DIETER MEINRAD, ROSENFELD, MICHAEL G · 2020 to 2023
$4.5M
High-throughput functional characterization of human enhancersUM1HG009393 · NHGRI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI LIS, JOHN T, YU, HAIYUAN · 2017 to 2021
$4.1M
Integrated high-throughput functional assays to identify ulcerative colitis causal risk variantsR01DK115398 · NIDDK · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI KLEIN, ROBERT J., YU, HAIYUAN · 2018 to 2022
$3.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS UM1 HG009393NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD082568NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK115398NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK127778NIGMS NIH HHS RM1 GM139738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mounting evidence supports the idea that transcriptional patterns serve as more specific identifiers of active enhancers than histone marks; however, the optimal strategy to identify active enhancers both experimentally and computationally has not been determined. Here, we compared 13 genome-wide RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) assays in K562 cells and show that nuclear run-on followed by cap-selection assay (GRO/PRO-cap) has advantages in enhancer RNA detection and active enhancer identification. We also introduce a tool, peak identifier for nascent transcript starts (PINTS), to identify active promoters and enhancers genome wide and pinpoint the precise location of 5' transcription start sites. Finally, we compiled a comprehensive enhancer candidate compendium based on the detected enhancer RNA (eRNA) transcription start sites (TSSs) available in 120 cell and tissue types, which can be accessed at https://pints.yulab.org . With knowledge of the best available assays and pipelines, this large-scale annotation of candidate enhancers will pave the way for selection and characterization of their functions in a time- and labor-efficient manner.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticRNAPromoter Regions, GeneticSequence Analysis, RNATranscription Initiation SiteRNA

Identifiers

PMID35177836
PMCPMC9288987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.