Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35177797›Full record

ArticleLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2022

Interpretable tumor differentiation grade and microsatellite instability recognition in gastric cancer using deep learning.

Feng Su, Jianmin Li, Xinya Zhao, Beining Wang, Yajie Hu, Yu Sun, Jiafu Ji

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. World Endoscopy Organization Position Statements for Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopic Diagnosis of Gastric Epithelial Neoplasia.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Machine learning methods for histopathological image analysis: Updates in 2024.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Feng Su *Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China.
Jianmin Li *Institute for Artificial Intelligence, the State Key Laboratory of Intelligence Technology and Systems, Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology, Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, 100084, Beijing, China.
Xinya Zhao *Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, China.
Beining Wang *Institute for Artificial Intelligence, the State Key Laboratory of Intelligence Technology and Systems, Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology, Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, 100084, Beijing, China.
Yajie HuKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, China.
Yu SunKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, China. yusun@bjcancer.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3024-0331
Jiafu JiKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 100142, Beijing, China. jijiafu@hsc.pku.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6878-5543
Peking University · CNTsinghua University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer possesses great histological and molecular diversity, which creates obstacles for rapid and efficient diagnoses. Classic diagnoses either depend on the pathologist's judgment, which relies heavily on subjective experience, or time-consuming molecular assays for subtype diagnosis. Here, we present a deep learning (DL) system to achieve interpretable tumor differentiation grade and microsatellite instability (MSI) recognition in gastric cancer directly using hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining whole-slide images (WSIs). WSIs from 467 patients were divided into three cohorts: the training cohort with 348 annotated WSIs, the testing cohort with 88 annotated WSIs, and the integration testing cohort with 31 original WSIs without tumor contour annotation. First, the DL models comprehensibly achieved tumor differentiation recognition with an F1 values of 0.8615 and 0.8977 for poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (PDA) and well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (WDA) classes. Its ability to extract pathological features about the glandular structure formation, which is the key to distinguishing between PDA and WDA, increased the interpretability of the DL models. Second, the DL models achieved MSI status recognition with a patient-level accuracy of 86.36% directly from HE-stained WSIs in the testing cohort. Finally, the integrated end-to-end system achieved patient-level MSI recognition from original HE staining WSIs with an accuracy of 83.87% in the integration testing cohort with no tumor contour annotation. The proposed system, therefore, demonstrated high accuracy and interpretability, which can potentially promote the implementation of artificial intelligence healthcare.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaDeep LearningStomach NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceEosine Yellowish-(YS)HumansMicrosatellite InstabilityEosine Yellowish-(YS)

Identifiers

PMID35177797
OpenAlexW4212955243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.