ArticleCommunications biology2022
BrewerIX enables allelic expression analysis of imprinted and X-linked genes from bulk and single-cell transcriptomes.
Article in Communications biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Serum coating enables feeder-free culture of naive human pluripotent stem cells preserving developmental potential.The EMBO journal · 2026Article
- Challenges and emerging strategies for genome-wide evaluation of loss of imprinting in cancer.British journal of biomedical science · 2026Review
- The role of imprinting genes' loss of imprints in cancers and their clinical implications.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Chemical conversion of human conventional PSCs to TSCs following transient naive gene activation.EMBO reports · 2023Article
- BrewerIX enables allelic expression analysis of imprinted and X-linked genes from bulk and single-cell transcriptomes.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Variable allelic expression of imprinted genes at theFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic imprinting and X chromosome inactivation (XCI) are two prototypical epigenetic mechanisms whereby a set of genes is expressed mono-allelically in order to fine-tune their expression levels. Defects in genomic imprinting have been observed in several neurodevelopmental disorders, in a wide range of tumours and in induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Single Nucleotide Variants (SNVs) are readily detectable by RNA-sequencing allowing the determination of whether imprinted or X-linked genes are aberrantly expressed from both alleles, although standardised analysis methods are still missing. We have developed a tool, named BrewerIX, that provides comprehensive information about the allelic expression of a large, manually-curated set of imprinted and X-linked genes. BrewerIX does not require programming skills, runs on a standard personal computer, and can analyze both bulk and single-cell transcriptomes of human and mouse cells directly from raw sequencing data. BrewerIX confirmed previous observations regarding the bi-allelic expression of some imprinted genes in naive pluripotent cells and extended them to preimplantation embryos. BrewerIX also identified misregulated imprinted genes in breast cancer cells and in human organoids and identified genes escaping XCI in human somatic cells. We believe BrewerIX will be useful for the study of genomic imprinting and XCI during development and reprogramming, and for detecting aberrations in cancer, iPSCs and organoids. Due to its ease of use to non-computational biologists, its implementation could become standard practice during sample assessment, thus raising the robustness and reproducibility of future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.