Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35177754›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2022

Drone honey bees are disproportionately sensitive to abiotic stressors despite expressing high levels of stress response proteins.

Alison McAfee, Bradley N Metz, Joseph P Milone, Leonard J Foster, David R Tarpy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alison McAfeeDepartment of Entomology & Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA. amcafee@ncsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3523-6649
Bradley N MetzDepartment of Entomology & Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA. bnmetz@ncsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3946-6866
Joseph P MiloneDepartment of Entomology & Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
Leonard J FosterDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T1Z4, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8551-4817
David R TarpyDepartment of Entomology & Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
North Carolina State University · USUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research (FFAR) 549053United States Department of Agriculture | National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) 2016-07962
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drone honey bees (Apis mellifera) are the obligate sexual partners of queens, and the availability of healthy, high-quality drones directly affects a queen's fertility and productivity. Yet, our understanding of how stressors affect adult drone fertility, survival, and physiology is presently limited. Here, we investigated sex biases in susceptibility to abiotic stressors (cold stress, topical imidacloprid exposure, and topical exposure to a realistic cocktail of pesticides). We found that drones (haploid males) were more sensitive to cold and imidacloprid exposure than workers (sterile, diploid females), but the cocktail was not toxic at the concentrations tested. We corroborated this lack of cocktail toxicity with in-hive exposures via pollen feeding. We then used quantitative proteomics to investigate protein expression profiles in the hemolymph of topically exposed workers and drones, and found that 34 proteins were differentially expressed in exposed drones relative to controls, but none were differentially expressed in exposed workers. Contrary to our hypothesis, we show that drones express surprisingly high baseline levels of putative stress response proteins relative to workers. This suggests that drones' stress tolerance systems are fundamentally rewired relative to workers, and susceptibility to stress depends on more than simply gene dose or allelic diversity.

Indexed as

Cold TemperatureAnimalsBeesFemaleGene Expression RegulationMaleNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsPesticidesSex FactorsStress, PhysiologicalimidaclopridNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsPesticides

Identifiers

PMID35177754
PMCPMC8854713
OpenAlexW4213352124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.