ArticleScientific reports2022
Blood pressure and mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: a population-based cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Benefits of Invasive Strategy in Stable Angina Patients with Low Systolic Blood Pressure: A Post Hoc Analysis of the ISCHEMIA Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Transforming free-text coronary angiography reports into structured, analyzable data using large language models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Joint blood pressure and resting heart rate trajectories and net adverse clinical events risk following PCI: an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Relationship between blood pressure and adverse clinical events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): a retrospective analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Blood pressure levels and risk of end-stage renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention: a nationwide population-based study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Association of office blood pressure with ischemic and bleeding events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Scientific reports · 2024Observational
- Change in pulse pressure and cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: The CLIDAS study.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024Article
- A phenomenological model of pulsatile blood pressure-affected degradation of polylactic acid (PLA) vascular stent.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Article
- The obesity paradox exists in Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of body mass index effects on clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in Asia.Tzu chi medical journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Revascularization procedures, including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), for coronary artery disease (CAD) are increasingly performed in Korea. However, studies on blood pressure control targets in these patients remain insufficient. To assess the relationship between baseline blood pressure and all-cause mortality in CAD patients who underwent PCI. A population-based retrospective cohort study based on the national claims database of the Korean National Health Insurance System, which represents the entire Korean population. A total 38,330 patients with a history of PCI for CAD between 2005 and 2008 were recruited and followed up for all-cause mortality until December 31, 2017. Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured, and they were classified into eight SBP and DBP groups each. The hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality were measured for each group. The pattern of SBP and DBP in this population followed a J-curve relationship for all-cause mortality, with the nadir point at 119 and 74 mmHg, respectively. In subjects aged > 60 years, high SBP (≥ 160 mmHg) and high DBP (≥ 90 mmHg) were significantly related to death. Moreover, in subjects aged > 60 years, low DBP (< 70 mmHg) was significantly related to mortality. There is a J-curve relationship between baseline blood pressure and all-cause mortality in patients who underwent PCI, and intensive lowering of blood pressure may be beneficial for these patients. However, the elderly population needs more attention as excessive BP lowering, particularly DBP, could instead increase the risk of death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.