ArticleScientific reports2022
Optimisation of self-healing of bio-foamed concrete bricks pores using Bacillus tequilensis under different temperature and CO
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synergistic enhancement of strength and durability in self-healing concrete using treated pineapple fibres and bacterial mineralization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Microbial-induced calcite precipitation by indigenous alkaliphilic bacteria: a dual-enzyme strategy for crack-healing in cementitious materials.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Building like a Coral-Parallelized, Multiscale Biofabrication.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- Study on Self-Healing Effect of Concrete Based on Epoxy Resin Adhesive.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Self-Healing Mechanical Properties of Selected Roofing Felts.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Review on Carbonation Study of Reinforcement Concrete Incorporating with Bacteria as Self-Healing Approach.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The self-healing of bio-concrete cracks and pores have been utilised worldwide to improve the properties of bio-concrete using different types of bacteria. Meanwhile, no published research was conducted to heal bio-foamed concrete bricks (B-FCB) pores using Bacillus tequilensis. Previous studies focused on the concentration of bacteria and neglect other factors that could affect the healing process. This research aimed to optimise the healing ratio of B-FCB pores using four factors: B. tequilensis concentration, concrete density, temperature and CO
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.