ArticleAnnals of laboratory medicine2022
Current Status of Serum Insulin and C-Peptide Measurement in Clinical Laboratories: Experience from 94 Laboratories in China.
Article in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- C-peptide as an important biomarker in diabetes management: The need for standardization of its measurement.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- The evolution of C-peptide's role in diabetes care.Current opinion in endocrinology, diabetes, and obesity · 2026Review
- Comparison of Islet Function in People With Different Glucose Metabolic States.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2026Article
- Call for Standardization of C-Peptide Measurement.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025Review
- Analysis of MicroRNA Signature Differentially Expressed in Pancreatic Islet Cells Treated with Pancreatic Cancer-Derived Exosomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Can the triglyceride-glucose index predict insulin resistance in LGA newborns?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023Article
- An Accurate Isotope Dilution Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for Serum C-Peptide and Its Use in Harmonization in China.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2023Article
- Comparability of C-Peptide Measurements - Current Status and Clinical Relevance.Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate measurements of serum insulin and C-peptide are needed for the therapy and classification of diabetes. This study investigated the status of serum insulin and C-peptide measurements in China by analyzing the results of five pooled serum samples measured in 94 laboratories.
methodsPatient serum samples were pooled into five groups according to insulin and C-peptide concentrations and measured in 94 laboratories using different measurement systems. The inter- and intra-laboratory %CV as well as inter- and intra-measurement system %CV were calculated to assess the status of insulin and C-peptide measurements. To verify whether the disagreement between laboratories was due to different calibrators, as reported in previous studies, one low-level and one high-level sample extracted from the five pooled serum samples were used to recalibrate clinical measurement systems.
resultsThe mean intra-laboratory, intra-measurement system, inter-laboratory, and inter-measurement system %CVs were 2.7%, 4.8%, 21.8%, and 22.4%, respectively, for insulin and 2.3%, 6.7%, 16.4%, and 24.5%, respectively, for C-peptide. The inter- and intra-laboratory %CVs for insulin decreased with increasing concentration. After recalibration with low- and high-level samples, the mean inter-measurement %CV decreased from 22.4% to 17.2% for insulin and from 24.5% to 5.7% for C-peptide.
conclusionsThe intra-laboratory and intra-measurement system imprecision values are satisfactory for serum insulin and C-peptide measurements. However, the results from laboratories using different measurement systems were not comparable, and there is still much work needed to achieve the standardization or harmonization of serum insulin and C-peptide measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.