Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35177523›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2022

Risk Factors for Failing to Reach a Minimal Clinically Important Difference Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression.

Elliot D K Cha, Conor P Lynch, Cara E Geoghegan, Caroline N Jadczak, Shruthi Mohan, Kern Singh

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Effect of Lower Extremity Osteoarthritis on Outcomes of Lumbar Decompression.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elliot D K ChaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Conor P LynchDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Cara E GeogheganDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Caroline N JadczakDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Shruthi MohanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kern SinghDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA kern.singh@rushortho.com.
Rush University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinically important postoperative changes can be best evaluated through the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Our study aims to evaluate risk factors associated with failure to achieve MCID following lumbar decompression (LD).

methodsDemographics, perioperative characteristics, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) for pain, disability, and physical function were retrospectively reviewed and collected for patients undergoing LD. MCID achievement was calculated using established values. Relative risk of demographic and perioperative characteristics with failure to meet MCID for all PROMs was calculated. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used to estimate individual risk factors, and postestimation logistic regression was performed.

resultsThe study cohort included 811 patients. Comorbidity burden was associated with failed MCID for visual analog scale (VAS) back and leg pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Operative levels or duration was associated with failed MCID for VAS leg pain, 12-item short form physical component summary (SF-12 PCS), and the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function (PROMIS PF). Preoperative spinal pathology was associated with failed MCID for VAS leg pain, ODI, SF-12 PCS, and PROMIS PF. Additional risk factors included the type of operation, insurance, age, and body mass index. LASSO selected insurance, age, comorbidity burden, blood loss, operative duration, and type of spinal pathology as significant risk factors for failure to reach MCID.

conclusionFailure to reach MCID was greatest for VAS back. Age, comorbidity burden, and prolonged procedures were significantly associated with risk for failure to reach MCID for a majority of PROMs. Comorbidity burden combined with operative outcomes may place patients at increased risk for failure to reach MCID for pain, disability, and physical function following LD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4: CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Establishes risk factors for failing to reach the threshold of meaningful difference in symptoms after LD surgery.

Indexed as

lumbar decompressionminimal clinically important differenceoutcomes

Identifiers

PMID35177523
PMCPMC9519070
OpenAlexW4212999190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.