Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35177469›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Biology of selective caries removal: a systematic scoping review protocol.

Matthias Widbiller, Rita Weiler, Helge Knüttel, Kerstin M Galler, Wolfgang Buchalla, Konstantin J Scholz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthias WidbillerDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany matthias.widbiller@ukr.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7917-9466
Rita WeilerDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Helge KnüttelUniversity Library, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Kerstin M GallerDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Wolfgang BuchallaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Konstantin J ScholzDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4450-4238

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrimary goal of restorative caries therapy is to preserve pulp vitality and the dentition. Whereas the conventional approach of complete caries removal aims at the elimination of all affected substances without regard to losses of hard tissue or pulp vitality, the innovative concept of selective caries removal (SCR) is characterised by a targeted and non-invasive excavation. It presents a lower risk of accidental pulp exposure, which reportedly has a positive effect on tooth survival. Although clinical data show the benefits of SCR, knowledge about the biological processes during this procedure in the pulp-dentine complex of permanent teeth is scarce. Hence, the aim of this work is to systematically scope the existing literature and map the existing evidence according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guideline. This protocol details the scoping review's methodological and analytical approaches. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: First, a structure was established (phase I) as basis for a systematic scoping of literature (phase II). In the course of phase I, a total of 100 systematic reviews related to selective caries removal were searched in MEDLINE and information or theories on the biological processes were extracted. During the entire procedure, two reviewers independently screened the articles, and controversies were mediated by vote of a third reviewer. Eventually, it became apparent that different biological explanations can be organised into four categories: pulp response, cavity seal, remaining bacteria and cavity liner. Based on this structure, a search for original publications (phase II) will be performed and retrieved evidence will be assembled using a predefined conceptual framework. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As primary data will not be included in this study, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and summaries for key stakeholders.

Indexed as

Dental CareDental Caries SusceptibilityBiologyHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as Topicimmunologymicrobiologyoral medicine

Identifiers

PMID35177469
PMCPMC8860079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.