Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35177463›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2022

Assessment of global coagulation function under treatment with emicizumab concomitantly with bypassing agents in haemophilia A with inhibitor (UNEBI Study): multicentre open-label non-randomised clinical trial.

Kenichi Ogiwara, Masashi Taki, Takashi Suzuki, Hideyuki Takedani, Tadashi Matsushita, Kagehiro Amano, Masanori Matsumoto, Kenji Nishio, Midori Shima, Masato Kasahara and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. From a bispecific monoclonal antibody to gene therapy: A new era in the treatment of hemophilia A.Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Kenichi OgiwaraPediatrics, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3046-6915
Masashi TakiPediatrics, Sei Marianna University School of Medicine Yokohama Seibu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Takashi SuzukiBlood Coagulation, Medical Corporation Foundation Ogikubo Hospital, Suginami-ku, Japan.
Hideyuki TakedaniJoint Surgery, IMSUT Hospital, Minato-ku, Japan.
Tadashi MatsushitaBlood Transfusion Service, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Kagehiro AmanoLaboratory Medicine, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Japan.
Masanori MatsumotoBlood Transfusion Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.
Kenji NishioGeneral Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.
Midori ShimaPediatrics, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5922-7061
Masato KasaharaInstitute for Clinical and Translational Science, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.
Keiji NogamiPediatrics, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan roc-noga@naramed-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-2415-2194
Nara Medical University Hospital · JPGeneral Department of Preventive Medicine · VNImo State University Teaching Hospital · NGNagoya University Hospital · JPNational Blood Transfusion Service · NGOgikubo Hospital · JPTokyo Medical University · JPYokohama City Seibu Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSubcutaneous emicizumab prophylaxis substantially reduces bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A (PwHA) and factor VIII inhibitor. However, thrombotic events occurred in some PwHA with inhibitor who had received high cumulative doses of activated prothrombin complex concentrates at their breakthrough bleeds, when they were also given prophylactic emicizumab. After that, although the recommended guidance was proposed for bypassing agents (BPAs) therapy under emicizumab prophylaxis for haemostatic management, detailed investigation(s) is(are) required to elucidate the safe and appropriate dose of BPAs to use concomitantly with emicizumab prophylaxis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In the UNEBI Study, 60 PwHA with inhibitor will be enrolled for a maximum duration of 3 years, and samples of 20 events following concomitant use of BPAs with emicizumab will be collected. An 'event' is defined as obtaining blood samples before and after administration of BPA when a breakthrough bleed or a surgical procedure occurs. The coagulation potential in the obtained samples will be measured by global coagulation assays. The primary endpoint is the degree of improvement in the maximum coagulation rate by clot waveform analysis (CWA) before and after administration of fixed-dose BPAs. This parameter obtained from CWA, which is triggered with an optimally diluted mixture of prothrombin time/activated partial thromboplastin time-reagents, is reported to be an excellent marker for assessing the degree of improvement in coagulation potential in emicizumab-treated plasma. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The UNEBI Study was approved by the Japan Certified Review Board of Nara Medical University. The results of the study will be communicated through publication in international scientific journals and presentations at (inter)national conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs051190119.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificHemophilia AAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedFactor VIIIHemorrhageHumansAntibodies, BispecificAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedemicizumabFactor VIIIbleeding disorders & coagulopathiesclinical trialshaematology

Identifiers

PMID35177463
PMCPMC8860020
OpenAlexW4212888251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.