ArticleThe journal of international advanced otology2021
Vascular Anomaly in the Fallopian Canal Encountered Unexpectedly During Cochlear Implantation.
Article in The journal of international advanced otology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 68-year-old male with progressive sensorineural hearing loss underwent left cochlear implant surgery. While developing the posterior tympanotomy and identifying the facial nerve mastoid segment, gentle stimulation by the nerve stimulator resulted in unexpected profuse venous bleeding. After achieving hemostasis with Surgicel and Spongostan, the posterior tympanotomy was extended exposing a large aberrant vein running parallel to the tympanic and mastoid segments of the facial nerve in the fallopian canal. Good exposure and careful palpation of the vein assisted in ruling out facial nerve hemangioma. An intraoperative decision to proceed with implantation, taking into account limited benefit from future magnetic resonance imaging, was taken. The patient had a temporary 3-month post-operative facial nerve weakness, probably from pressure applied during hemostasis. Auditory cochlear implant function was excellent. A larger than normal diameter of the tympanic and mastoid segments of the facial nerve was seen in re-reviews of the preoperative computed tomography. We believe drawing the readers' attention to this anomaly, which to the best of our knowledge has not been previously described, can assist in the choice of preoperative imaging and increase awareness of deviation from the norm of facial nerve diameter. In addition, knowledge of possible venous anomalies may aid surgeons in such intraoperative decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.