ArticleJoint Commission journal on quality and patient safety2022
Addressing the Drivers of Medical Test Overuse and Cascades: User-Centered Design to Improve Patient-Doctor Communication.
Article in Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of a Peer Comparison and Educational Intervention on Medical Test Conversation Quality: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Adherence With Diagnostic Stewardship Guidance and Sociodemographic Characteristics in the PICU.Hospital pediatrics · 2026Article
- Tailoring Rheumatoid Arthritis Visit Timing Based on mHealth App Data: Mixed Methods Assessment of Implementation and Usability.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Factors associated with patients' demand for low-value care: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- The paradox of convenience: how information overload in mHealth apps leads to medical service overuse.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Article
- Examining patient perspectives on low-value care: Findings from a survey on preoperative testing for cataract surgery.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2023Article
- What Are the Best Practices for Co-Creating Patient-Facing Educational Materials? A Scoping Review of the Literature.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Clinical chemistry laboratory test overuse in a cardiology clinic: a single-center study.Journal of medicine and life · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLow-value medical testing is a major component of health care overuse, both directly and through the potential for borderline and/or incidental results to trigger cascades (downstream services of uncertain value). The costs and harms from marginal test results and their cascades can add up. It is thus important to both prevent low-value tests at the outset and mitigate cascades when they arise.
methodsInformed by a framework for understanding and reducing overuse of care, this study employed user-centered design methods (focus groups and 1:1 design meetings) with patients and primary care physicians (PCPs) to understand the problem and iteratively develop an intervention.
resultsDesign meetings with 15 PCPs, 12 patients, and 3 patient focus groups revealed myriad drivers for medical test overuse and cascades. Patients commonly believed that all medical tests yield definitive results and lack downsides. PCPs cited expert recommendations, limited time during visits, fear of lawsuits, and desire to be responsive to patients as reasons for ordering potentially low-value medical tests. To address these issues, an intervention was designed using patient pre-visit educational materials, clinician reference materials on test interpretation and incidental findings, and clinician peer comparison on test overuse.
conclusionOveruse of medical testing is driven by a range of factors related to PCPs, patients, and their interactions. Multipronged interventions may have the potential to address these drivers after they are rigorously tested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.