Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35177146›Full record

ArticleBJPsych bulletin2023

Plus ça change? Switching lithium preparations.

David A Cousins, Thomas R E Barnes, Allan H Young, Oriana Delgado, Carol Paton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych bulletin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David A CousinsNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5682-7507
Thomas R E BarnesImperial College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2324-656X
Allan H YoungKing's College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2291-6952
Oriana DelgadoRoyal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK.
Carol PatonImperial College London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7756-1031

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L006642/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

methodA supply disruption alert in 2020, now rescinded, notified UK prescribers of the planned discontinuation of Priadel

resultsData on the treatment of 37 patients switched from Priadel CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: For comparable pre- and post-switch doses in adherent patients, the most common brands of lithium carbonate appear to produce similar plasma lithium levels. British National Formulary guidance relating to switching lithium brands may be unnecessarily complex.

Indexed as

adherenceCamcolitplasma lithium levelsPriadelswitch

Identifiers

PMID35177146
PMCPMC10063985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.