Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35177068›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022

Bone transport combined with bone graft and internal fixation versus simple bone transport in the treatment of large bone defects of lower limbs after trauma.

Qiang Huang, Yi Bo Xu, Cheng Ren, Ming Li, Cheng Cheng Zhang, Lu Liu, Qian Wang, Yao Lu, Hua Lin, Zhong Li and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qiang Huang *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hong Hui hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
Yi Bo Xu *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hong Hui hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
Cheng Ren *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hong Hui hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
Ming LiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hong Hui hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
Cheng Cheng ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hong Hui hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
Lu LiuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hong Hui hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
Qian WangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hong Hui hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
Yao LuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hong Hui hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
Hua LinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hong Hui hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
Zhong LiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hong Hui hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
Han Zhong XueDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hong Hui hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
Kun ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hong Hui hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China. gukezhangk@163.com.
Teng MaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hong Hui hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University College of Medicine, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China. free40@126.com.
Xi'an Honghui Hospital · CNXi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBone transport has been successfully applied for the management of large segmental bone defects. However, its main shortcoming is the long-lasting consolidation period, which may cause lots of related complications. To overcome this shortcoming, we developed bone transport combined with bone graft and internal fixation technique. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical effects of this modified technique with simple bone transport in the treatment of large segmental bone defects of lower limbs after trauma.

methodsEighty-four patients with large segmental bone defects treated in our institution from January 2014 to January 2017 were selected for retrospective study. A total of 77 cases were completely followed. Among them, 35 patients were treated by bone transport combined with bone graft and internal fixation technique (Group A), and 42 by simple bone transport technique (Group B). Patients with open injuries were classified according to Gustilo-Anderson (GA) classification. The general data of Group A and B were compared. The time in external fixator, total cure time and operation times of two groups were recorded. Ennecking score was used to evaluate the recovery of limb functions while self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) for the postoperative anxiety evaluation. In addition, the total complication incidence was compared between Group A and B.

resultsThere was no significant difference in demographic data between Group A and B (p > 0.05). The time in external fixator of Group A and B was (4.8 ± 1.6) and (18.2 ± 3.9) months, respectively (p < 0.05). The total cure time was (17.6 ± 2.2) and (20.4 ± 2.8) months in Group A and B (p < 0.05). The number of operations in Group A and B was (4.9 ± 1.2) and (4.8 ± 1.0) (p > 0.05). Ennecking score of Group A and B was 84.7 and 75.7% (p < 0.05). SAS score and total complication incidence in Group A were significantly lower than those in Group B (p < 0.05).

conclusionsThe clinical effects of bone transport combined with bone graft and internal fixation technique were better than that of simple bone transport technique, including shorter time in external fixator, shorter total cure time, lower anxiety score and better limb functions.

Indexed as

Tibial FracturesExternal FixatorsFracture Fixation, InternalHumansLower ExtremityRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBone defectBone graftBone transportInternal fixation

Identifiers

PMID35177068
PMCPMC8851812
OpenAlexW4212881813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.