Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35177055›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Implementation of a campus-based and peer-delivered HIV self-testing intervention to improve the uptake of HIV testing services among university students in Zimbabwe: the SAYS initiative.

Fadzai Mukora-Mutseyekwa, Paddington Tinashe Mundagowa, Rugare Abigail Kangwende, Tsitsi Murapa, Mandla Tirivavi, Waraidzo Mukuwapasi, Samantha Nokuthula Tozivepi, Charles Uzande, Queen Mutibura, Elizabeth Marian Chadambuka and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fadzai Mukora-MutseyekwaClinical Research Centre, Africa University, 132 H. Chitepo Street, Mutare, Zimbabwe.
Paddington Tinashe MundagowaClinical Research Centre, Africa University, 132 H. Chitepo Street, Mutare, Zimbabwe. mundagowap@africau.edu.
Rugare Abigail KangwendeMonitoring & Evaluation Unit, Ministry of Health & Child Care, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Tsitsi MurapaDepartment of Students' Affairs, Africa University, P. O. Box, 1320, Mutare, Zimbabwe.
Mandla TirivaviClinical Research Centre, Africa University, 132 H. Chitepo Street, Mutare, Zimbabwe.
Waraidzo MukuwapasiClinical Research Centre, Africa University, 132 H. Chitepo Street, Mutare, Zimbabwe.
Samantha Nokuthula TozivepiClinical Research Centre, Africa University, 132 H. Chitepo Street, Mutare, Zimbabwe.
Charles UzandeHIV/STI/TB Unit, Ministry of Health and Child Care, Manicaland Province, Mutare, Zimbabwe.
Queen MutiburaHIV/STI/TB Unit, Ministry of Health and Child Care, Manicaland Province, Mutare, Zimbabwe.
Elizabeth Marian ChadambukaDepartment of Public Health & Nursing Sciences, Africa University, 1 Fairview Road, Old Mutare, Zimbabwe.
Mazvita MachingaChair of Pastoral Care & Counseling Services, Number 3, 13th Avenue, Mutare, Zimbabwe.
Africa University · ZWMinistry of Health and Child Welfare · ZW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe uptake of HIV testing services among adolescents and young adults in Zimbabwe is low due to stigma associated with the risk of mental and social harm. The WHO recommends HIV self-testing (HIVST) as an innovative approach to improve access to HIV testing for this hard-to-reach populations. This study describes the development and implementation of a coordinated multifaceted and multidisciplinary campus-based approach to improve the uptake of HIV testing among university students in Zimbabwe.

methodsWe utilized both quantitative and qualitative methods guided by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment Framework. A formative survey, in-depth interviews, and a scoping review were conducted as part of the situation analysis. Implementers (peer educators and health workers) were trained and community dialogue sessions were conducted to ascertain the determinants (enablers and barriers) influencing both the inner and outer contexts. Self-test kits were disbursed over 6 months before a summative evaluation survey was conducted. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically while the chi-squared test was used to analyze quantitative data.

resultsThe formative evaluation showed that 66% of students intended to test and 44% of the enrolled students collected HIVST test kits. Giving comprehensive and tailored information about the intervention was imperative to dispel the initial skepticism among students. Youth-friendly and language-specific packaging of program materials accommodated the students. Despite the high acceptability of the HIVST intervention, post-test services were poorly utilized due to the small and isolated nature of the university community. Implementers recommended that the students seek post-test services off-site to ensure that those with reactive results are linked to treatment and care.

conclusionsPeer-delivered HIVST using trained personnel was acceptable among adolescents and young adults offered the intervention at a campus setting. HIVST could increase the uptake of HIV testing for this population given the stigma associated with facility-based HTS and the need for routine HIV testing for this age group who may not otherwise test. An off-site post-test counseling option is likely to improve the implementation of a campus-based HIVST and close the linkage to treatment and care gap.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSelf-TestingAdolescentHIV TestingHumansMass ScreeningStudentsUniversitiesYoung AdultZimbabweAdolescentEPIS frameworkHIVImplementation scienceSelf-testingYoung adult

Identifiers

PMID35177055
PMCPMC8855554
OpenAlexW4213281600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.