Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35177049›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2022

Characterizing uncertainty in goals-of-care discussions among black and white patients: a qualitative study.

Annie T Chen, Shelley Tsui, Rashmi K Sharma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Annie T ChenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington School of Medicine, 850 Republican St, Box 358047, 98109, Seattle, WA, United States. atchen@uw.edu.
Shelley TsuiUniversity of Washington, WA, Seattle, United States.
Rashmi K SharmaDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.
University of Washington · US

Funding

University of Washington Biomedical Informatics and Data Science Research Training ProgramT15LM007442 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JOHN H. GENNARI, Andrea L. Hartzler · 2002 to 2026
$19.6M
Career Development in Women's Health (CDWH)K12HD055884 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI DUNAIF, ANDREA E · 2007 to 2016
$4.2M
American Cancer Society MRSG 14-058-01-PCSMNICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055884NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007442Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center Director's Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUncertainty has been associated with distress and poorer quality of life in patients with advanced cancer. Prior studies have focused on prognostic uncertainty; little is known about other types of uncertainty that patients and family members experience when discussing goals of care. Understanding the types of uncertainty expressed and differences between Black and White patients can inform the development of uncertainty management interventions.

methodsThis study sought to characterize the types of uncertainty expressed by Black and White patients and family members within the context of information needs during inpatient goals-of-care discussions. We performed a secondary analysis of transcripts from 62 recorded goals-of-care discussions that occurred between 2012 and 2014 at an urban, academic medical center in the United States. We applied an adapted taxonomy of uncertainty to data coded as describing information needs and used an inductive qualitative analysis method to analyze the discussions. We report the types of uncertainty expressed in these discussions.

resultsFifty discussions included patient or family expressions of information needs. Of these, 40 discussions (n=16 Black and n=24 White) included statements of uncertainty. Black and White patients and families most frequently expressed uncertainty related to processes and structures of care (system-centered uncertainty) and to treatment (scientific uncertainty). Statements of prognostic uncertainty focused on quantitative information among Whites and on qualitative information and expectations for the future among Blacks.

conclusionsBlack and White patients and families frequently expressed system-centered uncertainty, suggesting this may be an important target for intervention. Addressing other sources of uncertainty, such as prognostic uncertainty, may need more tailored approaches.

Indexed as

GoalsQuality of LifeFamilyHumansQualitative ResearchUncertaintyCommunicationGoals-of-care discussionsInformation needsRacial differencesUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID35177049
PMCPMC8851788
OpenAlexW4212875487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.