ArticleBMC psychiatry2022
Determinants of never-treated status in rural versus urban contexts for individuals with schizophrenia in a population-based study in China.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world antipsychotic prescribing patterns and mortality in schizophrenia: a registry cohort study from China.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2026Article
- Development and administration of the flexible adapted cognitive test battery for schizophrenia (FACTS).Schizophrenia research. Cognition · 2025Article
- Clinical and Sociodemographic Correlations with Neurological Soft Signs in Hospitalized Patients with Schizophrenia: A Preliminary Longitudinal Study.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Medication adherence among community-dwelling schizophrenia patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study.Psychiatry research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA goal of China's 2012 National Mental Health Law is to improve access to services and decrease urban versus rural disparities in services. However, pre-reform data is needed for objective evaluation of these reforms' effectiveness. Accordingly, this study compares the pre-reform utilization of medical services for the treatment of schizophrenia in rural and urban communities in China.
methodsIn a large community-based study in four provinces representing 12% of China's population conducted from 2001 to 2005, we identified 326 individuals with schizophrenia (78 never treated). Comparing those living in urban (n = 86) versus rural (n = 240) contexts, we used adjusted Poisson regression models to assess the relationship of 'never treated' status with family-level factors (marital status, family income, and number of co-resident family members) and illness severity factors (age of onset, symptom severity and functional impairment).
resultsDespite similar impairments due to symptoms, rural patients were less likely to have received intensive mental health services (i.e., use psychiatric inpatient services), and appeared more likely to be 'never treated' or to only have received outpatient care. Among rural patients, only having more than four co-resident family members was independently associated with 'never-treated' status (RR = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12-0.94; p = 0.039). Among urban patients, only older age of onset was independently associated with 'never-treated' status (RR = 1.06; 95% CI 1.02-1.10, p = 0.003).
conclusionsIdentifying differential drivers of service utilization in urban and rural communities is needed before implementing policies to improve the utilization and equity of services and to define metrics of program success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.