Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35177006›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2022

The feasibility and reliability of measuring forearm muscle thickness by ultrasound in a geriatric inpatient setting: a cross-sectional pilot study.

Delky Meza-Valderrama, Dolores Sánchez-Rodríguez, Stany Perkisas, Xavi Duran, Sophie Bastijns, Vanesa Dávalos-Yerovi, Elizabeth Da Costa, Ester Marco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Delky Meza-ValderramaRehabilitation Research Group, Hospital Del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Carrer de Llull, 410, 08019, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. dmezaconcepcion@parcdesalutmar.cat.
Dolores Sánchez-RodríguezRehabilitation Research Group, Hospital Del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Carrer de Llull, 410, 08019, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Stany PerkisasUniversity Center of Geriatrics, Antwerp University, Leopoldstraat 26, 2000, Antwerp, Belgium.
Xavi DuranMethodological and Biostatistical Advisory Service. Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Sophie BastijnsUniversity Center of Geriatrics, Antwerp University, Leopoldstraat 26, 2000, Antwerp, Belgium.
Vanesa Dávalos-YeroviRehabilitation Research Group, Hospital Del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Carrer de Llull, 410, 08019, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Elizabeth Da CostaPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Hospital Del Mar - Hospital de L´Esperança, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Ester MarcoRehabilitation Research Group, Hospital Del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Carrer de Llull, 410, 08019, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Hospital Del Mar · ESUniversity of Antwerp · BEHospital de l'Esperança · ESParc de Salut · ESUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the potential benefits of introducing ultrasound in the clinical assessment of muscle disorders, this study aimed to assess the feasibility and reliability of measuring forearm muscle thickness by ultrasound in a geriatric clinical setting.

methodsCross-sectional pilot study in 25 participants (12 patients aged ≥ 70 years in an acute geriatric ward and 13 healthy volunteers aged 25-50 years), assessed by three raters. Muscle thickness measurement was estimated as the distance between the subcutaneous adipose tissue-muscle interface and muscle-bone interface of the radius at 30% proximal of the distance between the styloid process and distal insertion of the biceps brachii muscle of the dominant forearm. Examinations were repeated three times by each rater and intra- and inter-rater reliability was calculated. Feasibility analysis included consideration of technological, economic, legal, operational, and scheduling (TELOS) components.

resultsMean muscle-thickness measurement difference between groups was 4.4 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.4 mm to 6.3 mm], p < 0.001). Intra-rater reliability of muscle-thickness assessment was excellent, with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.947 (95%CI 0.902 to 0.974), 0.969 (95%CI 0.942 to 0.985), and 0.950 (95%CI 0.907 to 0.975) for observer A, B, and C, respectively. Inter-rater comparison showed good agreement (ICC of 0.873 [95%CI 0.73 to 0.94]). Four of the 17 TELOS components considered led to specific recommendations to improve the procedure's feasibility in clinical practice.

conclusionOur findings suggest that US is a feasible tool to assess the thickness of the forearm muscles with good inter-rater and excellent intra-rater reliability in a sample of hospitalized geriatric patients, making it a promising option for use in clinical practice.

Indexed as

ForearmInpatientsAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesHumansMuscle, SkeletalObserver VariationPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsUltrasonographyForearm muscle thicknessInter-rater reliabilityIntra-rater reliabilityMuscle ultrasoundUltrasound feasibility

Identifiers

PMID35177006
PMCPMC8855585
OpenAlexW4212923436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.