ArticleBMC genomic data2022
First-degree relationships and genotyping errors deciphered by a high-density SNP array in a Duroc × Iberian pig cross.
Article in BMC genomic data, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Repeated chip analysis for reducing the effect of genotyping errors on gene mapping for two recombinant inbred line populations in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Effect of genotyping errors on linkage map construction based on repeated chip analysis of two recombinant inbred line populations in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).BMC plant biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTwo individuals with a first-degree relationship share about 50 percent of their alleles. Parent-offspring relationships cannot be homozygous for alternative alleles (genetic exclusion).
methodsApplying the concept of genetic exclusion to HD arrays typed in animals for experimental purposes or genomic selection allows estimation of the rate of rejection of first-degree relationships as the rate at which two individuals typed for a large number of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) do not share at least one allele. An Expectation-Maximization algorithm is applied to estimate parentage. In addition, genotyping errors are estimated in true parent-offspring relationships. Samples from nine candidate Duroc sires and 55 Iberian dams producing 214 Duroc × Iberian barrows were typed for the HD porcine Affymetrix array.
resultsWe were able to establish paternity and maternity of 75 and 85 piglets, respectively. Rate of rejection in true parent-offspring relationships was estimated as 0.000735. This is a lower bound of the genotyping error since rate of rejection depends on allele frequencies. After accounting for allele frequencies, our estimate of the genotyping error is 0.6%. A total of 7,744 SNPs were rejected in five or more true parent-offspring relationships facilitating identification of "problematic" SNPs with inconsistent inheritance in multiple parent-offspring relationships.
conclusionsThis study shows that animal experiments and routine genotyping in genomic selection allow to establish or to verify first-degree relationships as well as to estimate genotyping errors for each batch of animals or experiment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.