Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35176940›Full record

ArticleBioengineered2022

m

Wei-Liang Ke, Zhi-Wen Huang, Chun-Ling Peng, Yi-Ping Ke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineered, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. A comprehensive review of m6 A methylation in coronary heart disease.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. N6-methyladenosine RNA landscape in the aged mouse hearts.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. LncRNA UCA1 enhances NRF2 expression through the mJournal of bioenergetics and biomembranes · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wei-Liang KeDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, P.R. China.
Zhi-Wen HuangDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, P.R. China.
Chun-Ling PengPhysical Examination Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, P.R. China.
Yi-Ping KePhysical Examination Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reperfusion therapy after acute myocardial infarction can induce myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Novel evidence has illustrated that N

Indexed as

Alpha-Ketoglutarate-Dependent Dioxygenase FTOMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryMyocytes, CardiacYAP-Signaling ProteinsAdenosineAnimalsApoptosisInflammationMiceRNA, MessengerAdenosineAlpha-Ketoglutarate-Dependent Dioxygenase FTOFTO protein, mouseRNA, MessengerYap1 protein, mouseYAP-Signaling ProteinsAcute myocardial infarctioncardiomyocyteFTON6-methyladenosine

Identifiers

PMID35176940
PMCPMC8974143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.