Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35176779›Full record

Observational studyRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2022

Adequacy of Antenatal Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Study with Postpartum Women.

Margot Marie Martin, Roxana Knobel, Vitor Nandi, Jessica Goedert Pereira, Alberto Trapani Junior, Carla Betina Andreucci

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Access and adequacy of antenatal care in a city in Brazil during two phases of the COVID-19 pandemic.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2024
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Adequacy of Antenatal Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Study with Postpartum Women.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022
    Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Margot Marie MartinDivisão de Saúde da Mulher, Hospital Universitário Polydoro Ernani de São Thiago, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2959-2129
Roxana KnobelDepartamento de ginecologia e obstetrícia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9180-4685
Vitor NandiDivisão de Saúde da Mulher, Hospital Universitário Polydoro Ernani de São Thiago, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5293-2366
Jessica Goedert PereiraDepartamento de ginecologia e obstetrícia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3828-2739
Alberto Trapani JuniorDivisão de Saúde da Mulher, Hospital Universitário Polydoro Ernani de São Thiago, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0196-4488
Carla Betina AndreucciDepartamento de medicina, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5590-108X
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BRPolydoro Ernani de São Thiago University Hospital · BRUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe present study aimed to evaluate the antenatal care adequacy for women who gave birth at the University Hospital of Santa Catarina in Florianopolis (Brazil) during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to evaluate the association of adequacy with sociodemographic, clinical, and access characteristics.

methodsData were collected between October and December 2020, including 254 patients who delivered in the University Hospital from Federal University of Santa Catarina and answered our questionnaires. Additional data were obtained from patients' antenatal booklets. Antenatal care was classified as adequate, intermediate, or inadequate according to the number of appointments, gestational age at the beginning of follow-up, and tests results. We carried out a descriptive statistical analysis and a bivariate/with odds ratio analysis on maternal sociodemographic, clinical and health access variables that were compared with antenatal adequacy.

resultsAntenatal care was considered adequate in 35.8% of cases, intermediate in 46.8%, and inadequate in 17.4%. The following maternal variables were associated with inadequate prenatal care (intermediate or inadequate prenatal care): having black or brown skin colour, having two or more children, being of foreign nationality, not being fluent in Portuguese, and using illicit drugs during pregnancy; the clinical variables were more than 6 weeks between appointments, and not attending high-risk antenatal care; as for access, the variables were difficulties in attending or scheduling appointments, and attending virtual appointments only.

conclusionIn a sample of pregnant women from a teaching hospital in Florianópolis during the COVID-19 pandemic, antenatal care was considered adequate in 35.8%, intermediate in 46.8%, and inadequate in 17.4% of cases.

Indexed as

COVID-19Prenatal CareChildFemaleGestational AgeHumansPandemicsPostpartum PeriodPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID35176779
PMCPMC9948289
OpenAlexW4212952916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.