Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35176480›Full record

ReviewOsteoarthritis and cartilage2022

International Foot and Ankle Osteoarthritis Consortium review and research agenda for diagnosis, epidemiology, burden, outcome assessment and treatment.

International Foot and Ankle Osteoarthritis Consortium, J B Arnold, C J Bowen, L S Chapman, L S Gates, Y M Golightly, J Halstead, M T Hannan, H B Menz, S E Munteanu and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Plate versus screw fixation and long-term ankle osteoarthritis in posterior malleolar fractures: A Bartoníček-based cohort study.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ankle morphometry based on CT in Chinese population.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. ABiomaterials · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

International Foot and Ankle Osteoarthritis Consortium
J B ArnoldIIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia.
C J BowenSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Building 67, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK; Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis Research Versus Arthritis, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
L S ChapmanLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
L S GatesSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Building 67, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK; Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis Research Versus Arthritis, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Y M GolightlyDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 3330 Thurston Building, CB 7280, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
J HalsteadLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK; Podiatry Services, Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust, Leeds, LS6 1PF, UK.
M T HannanHinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, And Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02108, USA.
H B MenzSchool of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3086, Australia; Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK. Electronic address: h.menz@latrobe.edu.au.
S E MunteanuSchool of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3086, Australia.
K L PatersonCentre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
E RoddyPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK; Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Haywood Hospital, Burslem, Staffordshire, ST6 7AG, UK.
H J SiddleLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
M J ThomasPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK; Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Haywood Hospital, Burslem, Staffordshire, ST6 7AG, UK.

Funding

Foot Disorders, Pain and Physical Disability in EldersR01AR047853 · NIAMS · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI HANNAN, MARIAN T. · 2002 to 2012
$5.1M
Foot Disorders and Falls in a Population-Based CohortR01AG026316 · NIA · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI HANNAN, MARIAN T. · 2005 to 2009
$1.6M
Department of Health NIHR300818Medical Research Council G0501798NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR047853NIA NIH HHS R01 AG026316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo summarise the available evidence relating to the diagnosis, epidemiology, burden, outcome assessment and treatment of foot and ankle osteoarthritis (OA) and to develop an agenda to guide future research.

methodMembers of the International Foot and Ankle Osteoarthritis Consortium compiled a narrative summary of the literature which formed the basis of an interactive discussion at the Osteoarthritis Research Society International World Congress in 2021, during which a list of 24 research agenda items were generated. Following the meeting, delegates were asked to rank the research agenda items on a 0 to 100 visual analogue rating scale (0 = not at all important to 100 = extremely important). Items scoring a mean of 70 or above were selected for inclusion.

resultsOf the 45 delegates who attended the meeting, 31 contributed to the agenda item scoring. Nineteen research agenda items met the required threshold: three related to diagnosis, four to epidemiology, four to burden, three to outcome assessment and five to treatment.

conclusionsKey knowledge gaps related to foot and ankle OA were identified, and a comprehensive agenda to guide future research planning was developed. Implementation of this agenda will assist in improving the understanding and clinical management of this common and disabling, yet relatively overlooked condition.

Indexed as

AnkleOsteoarthritisAnkle JointHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePain MeasurementConsensusFootOsteoarthritisReview

Identifiers

PMID35176480
PMCPMC10464637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.