Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35176293›Full record

ArticleToxicology and applied pharmacology2022

Predicting nonlinear relationships between external and internal concentrations with physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling.

Daniel Hoer, Hugh A Barton, Alicia Paini, Michael Bartels, Brandall Ingle, Jeanne Domoradzki, Jeffrey Fisher, Michelle Embry, Philip Villanueva, David Miller and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel HoerU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Durham, NC, USA.
Hugh A BartonConsultant, Mystic, CT, USA.
Alicia PainiEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy. Electronic address: alicia.paini@esqlabs.com.
Michael BartelsToxMetrics.com, LLC, Midland, MI, USA.
Brandall IngleU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Durham, NC, USA.
Jeanne DomoradzkiCorteva Agriscience, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Jeffrey FisherScitoVation, Durham, NC, USA.
Michelle EmbryHealth and Environmental Sciences Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Philip VillanuevaU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington, DC, USA.
David MillerU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington, DC, USA.
James NguyenU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington, DC, USA.
Qiang ZhangGangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Stephen W EdwardsRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Yu-Mei TanU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: tan.cecilia@epa.gov.
Environmental Protection Agency · USCorteva (United States) · USEmory University · USHealth and Environmental Sciences Institute · USJoint Research Centre · ITMystic Seaport · USRTI International · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although external concentrations are more readily quantified and often used as the metric for regulating and mitigating exposures to environmental chemicals, the toxicological response to an environmental chemical is more directly related to its internal concentrations than the external concentration. The processes of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) determine the quantitative relationship between the external and internal concentrations, and these processes are often susceptible to saturation at high concentrations, which can lead to nonlinear changes in internal concentrations that deviate from proportionality. Using generic physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models, we explored how saturable absorption or clearance influence the shape of the internal to external concentration (IEC) relationship. We used the models for hypothetical chemicals to show how differences in kinetic parameters can impact the shape of an IEC relationship; and models for styrene and caffeine to explore how exposure route, frequency, and duration impact the IEC relationships in rat and human exposures. We also analyzed available plasma concentration data for 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid to demonstrate how a PBPK modeling approach can be an alternative to common statistical methods for analyzing dose proportionality. A PBPK modeling approach can be a valuable tool used in the early stages of a chemical safety assessment program to optimize the design of longer-term animal toxicity studies or to interpret study results.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsRatsAnimal Study DesignInternal ConcentrationsNonlinear PharmacokineticsPhysiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK)Saturation of AbsorptionSaturation of Clearance

Identifiers

PMID35176293
PMCPMC10519136
OpenAlexW4213255185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.