Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35176246›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Public health2022

The effect of social deprivation on the dynamic of SARS-CoV-2 infection in France: a population-based analysis.

Stéphanie Vandentorren, Sabira Smaïli, Edouard Chatignoux, Marine Maurel, Caroline Alleaume, Lola Neufcourt, Michelle Kelly-Irving, Cyrille Delpierre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Social inequalities in COVID-19-related years of life lost in metropolitan France, 2020.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stéphanie VandentorrenSanté Publique France, Saint-Maurice, France; University of Bordeaux, INSERM UMR 1219-Bordeaux Population Health, Bordeaux, France. Electronic address: stephanie.vandentorren@santepubliquefrance.fr.
Sabira SmaïliSanté Publique France, Saint-Maurice, France.
Edouard ChatignouxSanté Publique France, Saint-Maurice, France.
Marine MaurelCERPOP UMR 1295, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, INSERM, Toulouse, France.
Caroline AlleaumeSanté Publique France, Saint-Maurice, France.
Lola NeufcourtCERPOP UMR 1295, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, INSERM, Toulouse, France.
Michelle Kelly-IrvingCERPOP UMR 1295, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, INSERM, Toulouse, France; IFERISS, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, INSERM, Toulouse, France.
Cyrille DelpierreCERPOP UMR 1295, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, INSERM, Toulouse, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData on health inequalities related to the dynamic of SARS-CoV-2 infection in France are scarce. The aim of this study was to analyse the association between an area-based deprivation indicator and SARS-CoV-2 incidence, positivity, and testing rates between May 2020 and April 2021.

methodsWe analysed data reported to the Système d'Information de Dépistage Populationnel surveillance system between May 14, 2020 and April 29, 2021, which records the results of all SARS-CoV-2 tests in France. Residential addresses of tested individuals were geocoded to retrieve the associated aggregated units for the statistical information (IRIS) scale, corresponding to an area comprising 2000 inhabitants relatively homogenous in terms of socioeconomic characteristics. A social deprivation score was assigned to each area using the European Deprivation Index (EDI). We fitted negative binomial generalised additive models to model the age-standardised and sex-standardised ratios for SARS-CoV-2 incidence, positivity rates, and testing rates, and to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% CIs of their association with EDI quintiles, using the first quintile (least deprived) as the reference category, adjusted for week, population density, and region.

findingsAnalyses were based on 70 990 478 SARS-CoV-2 tests, of which 5 000 972 were positive. SARS-CoV-2 incidence was higher in the most deprived areas than the least deprived areas (IRR 1·148 [95% CI 1·138-1·158]) and positivity rates were also higher (IRR 1·283 [1·273-1·294]), whereas testing rates were lower in the most deprived areas than the least deprived areas (IRR 0·905 [0·904-0·907]). SARS-CoV-2 incidence and positivity rates remained higher in the most deprived areas than the least deprived areas during the second and third national lockdowns, and variation in testing rate was observed according to population density.

interpretationOur results highlight a positive social gradient between deprivation and the risk of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, with the highest risk among individuals living in the most deprived areas and a negative social gradient for testing rate. These findings might reflect structural barriers to health-care access in France and lower capacity of deprived populations to benefit from protective measures.

fundingNone.

Indexed as

Public Health SurveillanceSocial DeprivationAdolescentAdultAgedCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingFemaleFranceHealthcare DisparitiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID35176246
PMCPMC8843336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.