ReviewJournal of cosmetic dermatology2022
Why is generation MZ passionate about good consumption of K-cosmetics amid the COVID-19 pandemic?
Review in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Motivation for improving academic achievement in cosmetological education.Health science reports · 2022Article
- Why is generation MZ passionate about good consumption of K-cosmetics amid the COVID-19 pandemic?Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2022Review
- Good ingredients from foods to vegan cosmetics after COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2022Review
- Relationship between Personal Values and Intentions to Purchase Plant-Based Meat Alternatives: Application of the Dual Concern Theory.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- How Does Adolescents' Usage of Social Media Affect Their Dietary Satisfaction?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe ongoing pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is putting millions at risk in more and more countries, making it a serious public health threat worldwide. Under such circumstances, "Untact" and "Streaming Life" are emerging as major trends in the recent service industry, and the beauty lives commerce market is expanding centering on mobile shopping in Republic of Korea.
objectivesThis study descriptively investigated changes in the needs of beauty and cosmetics industry consumers for good consumption of the MZ generation after COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsThis review paper is a literature review, and a narrative review approach has been used for this study. A total of 300 to 400 references were selected using representative journal search websites such as PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, ResearchGate, and RISS, of which a total of 39 papers were selected in the final stage based on 2009 to 2021.
resultsAn E-commerce packaging production and use have grown steadily in recent years as online purchases increase. As a result, the impact on the environment has also increased. Humanity faces climate change, pollution, environmental degradation, and/or destruction of air, soil, water, and ecosystems. The climate and environmental crisis will be one of the greatest challenges in human history. This review paper conducted a comprehensive study on the good consumption of MZ generation for K-Cosmetics in COVID-19 pandemic.
conclusionThis review clearly identifies the needs of consumers in the beauty and cosmetics industry for good consumption of the MZ generation for K-beauty in COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, it is expected to be used as an important marketing material in the global cosmetics market by confirming new changes in the Korean cosmetic market, which is the center of K-Beauty and K-Cosmetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.