Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35176132›Full record

ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2022

Nailfold capillaroscopy in SSc: innocent bystander or promising biomarker for novel severe organ involvement/progression?

Amber Vanhaecke, Maurizio Cutolo, Oliver Distler, Valeria Riccieri, Yannick Allanore, Christopher P Denton, Eric Hachulla, Francesca Ingegnoli, Ellen Deschepper, Jérôme Avouac and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Re-envisioning clinical trial design in systemic sclerosis.Expert review of clinical immunology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Amber VanhaeckeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ghent University.ORCID 0000-0002-1989-7060
Maurizio CutoloLaboratory of Experimental Rheumatology and Academic Division of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, IRCCS San Martino Polyclinic Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Oliver DistlerDepartment of Rheumatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Valeria RiccieriDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Yannick AllanoreService de Rheumatology, Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP CUP, Paris, France.
Christopher P DentonDepartment of Rheumatology, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3975-8938
Eric HachullaInstitute for Translational Research in Inflammation (INFINITE), Université de Lille.
Francesca IngegnoliDivision of Clinical Rheumatology, ASST Pini-CTO.ORCID 0000-0002-6727-1273
Ellen DeschepperBiostatistics Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Jérôme AvouacService de Rheumatology, Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP CUP, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2463-218X
Suzana JordanDepartment of Rheumatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
David LaunayInstitute for Translational Research in Inflammation (INFINITE), Université de Lille.
Karin MelsensDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ghent University.ORCID 0000-0003-4125-7163
Carmen PizzorniLaboratory of Experimental Rheumatology and Academic Division of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, IRCCS San Martino Polyclinic Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Alberto SulliLaboratory of Experimental Rheumatology and Academic Division of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, IRCCS San Martino Polyclinic Hospital, Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3674-4880
Massimiliano VasileDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Ariane L HerrickDivision of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, University of Manchester, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust.ORCID 0000-0003-4941-7926
Vanessa SmithDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ghent University.ORCID 0000-0001-6271-7945
Ghent University Hospital · BEOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITInserm · FRSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity of Zurich · CHGhent University · BEManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesNailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC) plays a well-established role in differentiating primary from secondary RP due to SSc. However, the association of NVC with novel severe organ involvement/progression in SSc has never been evaluated in a multicentre, multinational study, which we now perform for the first time.

methodsFollow-up data from 334 SSc patients [265 women; 18 limited SSc (lSSc)/203 lcSSc/113 dcSSc] registered between November 2008 and January 2016 by seven tertiary centres in the EUSTAR-database, were analysed. Novel severe organ involvement/progression was defined as new/progressive involvement of the peripheral vasculature, lungs, heart, skin, gastrointestinal tract, kidneys, musculoskeletal system, or death, at the 12- or 24-month follow-up. NVC images at enrolment were quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated according to the standardized definitions of the EULAR Study Group on Microcirculation in Rheumatic Diseases. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression modelling (ULR, MLR) was performed.

resultsOf the 334 included SSc patients, 257 (76.9%) developed novel overall severe organ involvement/progression. Following MLR, normal capillary density was associated with less-frequent novel overall severe organ involvement/progression [odds ratio (OR) = 0.77, P < 0.001] and novel peripheral vascular involvement (OR = 0.79, P = 0.043); microhaemorrhages were associated with less novel pulmonary hypertension (OR = 0.47, P = 0.029); and a 'severe' (active/late) NVC pattern was associated with novel overall severe organ involvement/progression (OR = 2.14, P = 0.002) and skin progression (OR = 1.70, P = 0.049).

conclusionsOur results suggest that NVC may be a promising biomarker in SSc, certainly warranting further investigation. Despite the participation of tertiary centres, which follow their patients in a standardized way, we were underpowered to detect associations with infrequent severe organ involvement/progression.

Indexed as

Scleroderma, DiffuseScleroderma, SystemicBiomarkersCapillariesFemaleHumansMicroscopic AngioscopyNailsBiomarkersdisease progressionEULAR Study Group on Microcirculation in Rheumatic DiseasesEUSTARmicrocirculationnailfold videocapillaroscopyorgan involvementSSc

Identifiers

PMID35176132
PMCPMC9629390
OpenAlexW4212916896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.