Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35176015›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

Repeatability and reproducibility of a handheld quantitative G6PD diagnostic.

Benedikt Ley, Ari Winasti Satyagraha, Mohammad Golam Kibria, Jillian Armstrong, Germana Bancone, Amy K Bei, Greg Bizilj, Marcelo Brito, Xavier C Ding, Gonzalo J Domingo and 18 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Global perspectives onFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 12 institutions in 9 countries.

Benedikt LeyGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5734-0845
Ari Winasti SatyagrahaEijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-3237-2194
Mohammad Golam KibriaInternational Center for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-7821-2455
Jillian ArmstrongYale School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4593-7804
Germana BanconeShoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Mae Sot, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-4550-0431
Amy K BeiYale School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Greg BiziljPATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3648-5877
Marcelo BritoFundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9134-3970
Xavier C DingFIND, Geneva, Switzerland.
Gonzalo J DomingoPATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1004-4395
Michael E von FrickenGeorge Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2938-4549
Gornpan GornsawunShoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Mae Sot, Thailand.
Brandon LamJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Didier MenardInstitut Pasteur, INSERM U1201, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1357-4495
Wuelton MonteiroFundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus, Brazil.
Stefano OngarelloFIND, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0032-0691
Sampa PalPATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Lydia Visita PanggaloEijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Sunil ParikhYale School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9411-5180
Daniel A PfefferGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2204-3488
Ric N PriceGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2000-2874
Alessandra da Silva OrfanoYale School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Martina WadeYale School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Mariusz WojnarskiArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6710-6385
Kuntawunginn WorachetArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-4683-3764
Aqsa YarInstitut Pasteur, INSERM U1201, Paris, France.
Mohammad Shafiul AlamInternational Center for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-8330-5499
Rosalind E HowesFIND, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0992-1511
Yale University · USFIND · CHMahidol University · THProgram for Appropriate Technology in Health · USArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science · THCharles Darwin University · AUEijkman Institute for Molecular Biology · IDFundação de Medicina Tropical · BRInserm · FRInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDGeorge Mason University · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001864 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CANTLEY, LLOYD G, EDELMAN, E. JENNIFER · 2016 to 2025
$9.9M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001864NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863Wellcome Trust 200909/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe introduction of novel short course treatment regimens for the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax requires reliable point-of-care diagnosis that can identify glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficient individuals. While deficient males can be identified using a qualitative diagnostic test, the genetic make-up of females requires a quantitative measurement. SD Biosensor (Republic of Korea) has developed a handheld quantitative G6PD diagnostic (STANDARD G6PD test), that has approximately 90% accuracy in field studies for identifying individuals with intermediate or severe deficiency. The device can only be considered for routine care if precision of the assay is high. METHODS AND

findingsCommercial lyophilised controls (ACS Analytics, USA) with high, intermediate, and low G6PD activities were assessed 20 times on 10 Biosensor devices and compared to spectrophotometry (Pointe Scientific, USA). Each device was then dispatched to one of 10 different laboratories with a standard set of the controls. Each control was tested 40 times at each laboratory by a single user and compared to spectrophotometry results. When tested at one site, the mean coefficient of variation (CV) was 0.111, 0.172 and 0.260 for high, intermediate, and low controls across all devices respectively; combined G6PD Biosensor readings correlated well with spectrophotometry (rs = 0.859, p<0.001). When tested in different laboratories, correlation was lower (rs = 0.604, p<0.001) and G6PD activity determined by Biosensor for the low and intermediate controls overlapped. The use of lyophilised human blood samples rather than fresh blood may have affected these findings. Biosensor G6PD readings between sites did not differ significantly (p = 0.436), whereas spectrophotometry readings differed markedly between sites (p<0.001).

conclusionsRepeatability and inter-laboratory reproducibility of the Biosensor were good; though the device did not reliably discriminate between intermediate and low G6PD activities of the lyophilized specimens. Clinical studies are now required to assess the devices performance in practice.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesFemaleFreeze DryingGlucosephosphate DehydrogenaseGlucosephosphate Dehydrogenase DeficiencyHumansPoint-of-Care TestingReproducibility of ResultsSpectrophotometryGlucosephosphate Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID35176015
PMCPMC8853557
OpenAlexW4212896349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.