ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2022
Spatiotemporal Coherence to Quantify Sources of Image Degradation in Ultrasonic Imaging.
Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Vivo Demonstration of a Real-Time Temporal SNR Acoustic Output Adjustment Method.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024Article
- Human Observer Sensitivity to Temporal Noise During B-Mode Ultrasound Scanning: Characterization and Imaging Implications.Ultrasonic imaging · 2024Article
- A Coded Excitation Framework for High SNR Transcranial Ultrasound Imaging.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2023Article
- Large-Array Deep Abdominal Imaging in Fundamental and Harmonic Mode.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2023Article
- Combining ADMIRE and MV to Improve Image Quality.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Thermal noise and acoustic clutter signals degrade ultrasonic image quality and contribute to unreliable clinical assessment. When both noise and clutter are prevalent, it is difficult to determine which one is a more significant contributor to image degradation because there is no way to separately measure their contributions in vivo. Efforts to improve image quality often rely on an understanding of the type of image degradation at play. To address this, we derived and validated a method to quantify the individual contributions of thermal noise and acoustic clutter to image degradation by leveraging spatial and temporal coherence characteristics. Using Field II simulations, we validated the assumptions of our method, explored strategies for robust implementation, and investigated its accuracy and dynamic range. We further proposed a novel robust approach for estimating spatial lag-one coherence. Using this robust approach, we determined that our method can estimate the signal-to-thermal noise ratio (SNR) and signal-to-clutter ratio (SCR) with high accuracy between SNR levels of -30 to 40 dB and SCR levels of -20 to 15 dB. We further explored imaging parameter requirements with our Field II simulations and determined that SNR and SCR can be estimated accurately with as few as two frames and sixteen channels. Finally, we demonstrate in vivo feasibility in brain imaging and liver imaging, showing that it is possible to overcome the constraints of in vivo motion using high-frame rate M-Mode imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.