Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35175678›Full record

ArticleJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2022

In Vivo reflectance confocal microscopy of cutaneous acute graft-versus-host disease: concordance with histopathology and interobserver reproducibility of a glossary with representative images.

I Saknite, M Gill, C Alessi-Fox, J P Zwerner, J S Lehman, M M Shinohara, R A Novoa, H Chen, M Byrne, S Gonzalez and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

I SakniteDepartment of Dermatology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4000-5485
M GillSkinMedical Research and Diagnostics, PLLC, Dobbs Ferry, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2413-1916
C Alessi-FoxClinical Development, Caliber Imaging and Diagnostics Inc, Rochester, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6064-6311
J P ZwernerDepartment of Dermatology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
J S LehmanDepartment of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
M M ShinoharaDivision of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1388-5330
R A NovoaDepartment of Dermatology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
H ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
M ByrneVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9111-5895
S GonzalezFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9282-4784
M ArdigoSan Gallicano Dermatological Institute - IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5772-4937
E R TkaczykDepartment of Dermatology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2850-4740
Vanderbilt University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USCaliber Imaging and Diagnostics (United States) · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USSan Gallicano Hospital · ITStanford University · USSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University · USUniversidad de Alcalá · ESUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Vanderbilt Clinical Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA090625 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Debra L. Friedman, Paula Jill Hurley · 2001 to 2026
$16.9M
GVHD quantitative assessment in skin of Veterans post-HCTIK2CX001785 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI TKACZYK, ERIC R · 2019 to 2024
–
CSRD VA IK2 CX001785European Regional Development Fund 1.1.1.2/VIAA/4/20/665NCI NIH HHS K12 CA090625NIH HHS K12 CA090625Vanderbilt University Medical Center
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe reliability to non-invasively identify features of inflammatory dermatoses by reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) remains unknown. Lack of formal training among RCM readers can result in inconsistent assessments, limiting clinical utility. Specific consensus terminology with representative images is necessary to ensure consistent feature-level interpretation among RCM readers.

objectives(1) Develop a glossary with representative images of RCM features of cutaneous acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) for consistent interpretation among observers, (2) assess the interobserver reproducibility among RCM readers using the glossary, and (3) determine the concordance between RCM and histopathology for aGVHD features.

methodsThrough an iterative process of refinement and discussion among five international RCM experts, we developed a glossary with representative images of RCM features of aGVHD. From April to November 2018, patients suspected of aGVHD were imaged with RCM and subsequently biopsied. 17 lesions from 12 patients had clinically and pathologically confirmed cutaneous aGVHD. For each of these lesions, four dermatopathologists and four RCM readers independently evaluated the presence of aGVHD features in scanned histopathology slides and 1.5 × 1.5 mm RCM submosaics at 4 depths (blockstacks) respectively. RCM cases were adjudicated by a fifth RCM expert. Interobserver reproducibility was calculated by mean pairwise difference (U statistic). Concordance between modalities was determined by fraction of assignments with agreement.

resultsWe present a glossary with representative images of 18 aGVHD features by RCM. The average interobserver reproducibility among RCM readers (75%, confidence interval, CI: 71-79%) did not differ significantly from dermatopathologists (80%, 76-85%). The concordance between RCM and histopathology was 59%.

conclusionsBy using the glossary, the interobserver reproducibility among RCM readers was similar to the interobserver reproducibility among dermatopathologists. There was reasonable concordance between RCM and histopathology to visualize aGVHD features. The implementation of RCM can now be advanced in a variety of inflammatory conditions with a validated glossary and representative image set.

Indexed as

Graft vs Host DiseaseSkin NeoplasmsHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID35175678
PMCPMC9232909
OpenAlexW4213316174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.