ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022
Role of Graphene Family Nanomaterials in Skin Wound Healing and Regeneration.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements in wound management: integrating nanotechnology and smart materials for enhanced therapeutic interventions.Discover nano · 2024Review
- Advancements in employing two-dimensional nanomaterials for enhancing skin wound healing: a review of current practice.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Review
- Investigating Inflammatory Markers in Wound Healing: Understanding Implications and Identifying Artifacts.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024Review
- The Wound-Healing Activity of PEDOT-PSS in Animals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- 3D printed membranes of polylactic acid and graphene oxide for guided bone regeneration.Nanoscale advances · 2023Article
- Transforming Wound Management: Nanomaterials and Their Clinical Impact.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Owing to astonishing properties such as the large surface area to volume ratio, mechanical stability, antimicrobial property, and collagen crosslinking, graphene family nanomaterials (GFNs) have been widely used in various biomedical applications including tissue regeneration. Many review literatures are available to compile the role of GFNs in cardiac, bone, and neuronal tissue regeneration. However, the contribution of GFNs in skin wound healing and tissue regeneration was not yet discussed. In the present review, we have highlighted the properties of GFNs and their application in skin wound healing. In addition, we have included challenges and future directions of GFNs in skin tissue regeneration in the portion of conclusion and perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35175613What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.