ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2022
Population-based analysis of CNS tumor diagnoses, treatment, and survival in congenital and infant age groups.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spontaneous complete regression of congenital brain tumors - a systematic literature review and case report.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Pooled it
- Outcomes of Congenital Brain Tumors: A Single-Center Experience in a Low- and Middle-Income Country.Brain tumor research and treatment · 2026Article
- Report from the National Pediatric Cancer Foundation - infantile glioma and other non-embryonal central nervous system tumors: evolving molecular advances and current treatment landscape.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Global, regional, and national burden of brain and central nervous system cancer in children and adolescents, 1990-2021: A systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease study 2021.Pediatric investigation · 2025Article
- Exploring neonatal brain tumors: a narrative review about epidemiology, classification, and management.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- The Role of Early and Delayed Surgery for Infants with Congenital Brain Tumors.Cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- Brain stem tumors in children less than 3 months: Clinical and radiologic findings of a rare disease.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024Article
- Prognostic value of Ki-67 index in primary intracranial tumors of infants.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCongenital (< 3 months) and infant (3 to 11 months) brain tumors are biologically different from tumors in older children, but their epidemiology has not been studied comprehensively. Insight into epidemiological differences could help tailor treatment recommendations by age and increase overall survival (OS).
methodsPopulation-based data from SEER were obtained for 14,493 0-19-year-olds diagnosed with CNS tumors 1990-2015. Congenital and infant age groups were compared to patients aged 1-19 years based on incidence, treatment, and survival using Chi-square and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Hazard ratios were estimated from univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards survival analyses.
resultsBetween the < 3-month, 3-5-month, 6-11 month, and 1-19-year age groups, tumor type distribution differed significantly (p < 0.001). 5-year OS for all tumors was 36.7% (< 3 months), 56.0% (< 3-5 months), 63.8% (6-11 months), and 74.7% (1-19 years) (p < 0.001). Comparing between age groups by tumor type, OS was worst for < 3-month-olds with low-grade glioma, medulloblastoma, and other embryonal tumors; OS was worst for 3-5-month-olds with ependymoma, < 1-year-olds collectively with atypical teratoid-rhabdoid tumor, and 1-19-year-olds with high-grade glioma (HGG) (log rank p < 0.02 for all tumor types). Under 3-month-olds were least likely to receive any treatment for each tumor type and least likely to undergo surgery for all except HGG. Under 1-year-olds were far less likely than 1-19-year-olds to undergo both radiation and chemotherapy for embryonal tumors.
conclusionsSubtype distribution, treatment patterns, and prognosis of congenital/infant CNS tumors differ from those in older children. Better, more standardized treatment guidelines may improve poorer outcomes seen in these youngest patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.