Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35175509›Full record

ReviewInfectious diseases and therapy2022

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Colonization, Infection and Current Treatment Options.

Carmi Bartal, Kenneth V I Rolston, Lior Nesher

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06440304 (Therapeutic Strategies for Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii Infections), which is not on this map. Cited by 91 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06440304 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Therapeutic Strategies for Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii Infections: Study Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorClinical Hospital Centre ZagrebRan2025 to 2027Enrolled108ConditionsInfections, Bacterial, Sepsis BacterialArmsFosfomycin, Eravacycline, ampicillin/sulbactam
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Risk factors for carbapenem-resistantJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026
    Article
  16. Treating Extensively Drug-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Microbiological eradication of XDRFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Carmi BartalFaculty of Health Sciences, Internal Medicine, Soroka Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheba, Israel.
Kenneth V I RolstonThe Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control, and Employee Health, Unit 1460, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Lior NesherFaculty of Health Sciences, Internal Medicine, Soroka Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheba, Israel. nesherke@bgu.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1230-0428
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev · ILThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) causes colonization and infection predominantly in hospitalized patients. Distinction between the two is a challenge. When CRAB is isolated from a non-sterile site (soft tissue, respiratory samples, etc.), it probably represents colonization unless clear signs of infection (fever, elevated white blood count, elevated inflammatory markers and abnormal imaging) are present. Treatment is warranted only for true infections. In normally sterile sites (blood, cerebrospinal fluid) the presence of indwelling medical devices (catheters, stents) should be considered when evaluating positive cultures. In the absence of such devices, the isolate represents an infection and should be treated. If an indwelling device is present and there are no signs of active infection, the device should be replaced if possible, and no treatment is required. If there are signs of an active infection the device should be removed or replaced, and treatment should be administered. Current treatments options and clinical data are limited. No agent or combination regimen has been shown to be superior to any other in randomized clinical trials. Ampicillin-sulbactam appears to have the best evidence for initial use. This is probably due to its ability to saturate penicillin-binding proteins 1 and 3 when given in high dose. Tigecycline when used should be given in high dose as well. Polymyxins are a treatment option but are difficult to dose correctly and have significant side effects. Newer treatment options such as eravacycline and cefiderocol have potential; however, currently there are not enough data to support their use as single agents. Combination therapy appears to be the best treatment option and should always include high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam combined with another active agent such as high-dose tigecycline, polymyxins, etc. These infections require a high complexity of skill, and an infectious disease specialist should be involved in the management of these patients.

Indexed as

Acinetobacter infectionsCarbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceaeDrug resistanceMultiple

Identifiers

PMID35175509
PMCPMC8960525
OpenAlexW4213133581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.