ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2022
High-efficiency mechanically assisted alkaline extraction of nanoparticles from biological tissues for spICP-MS analysis.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Advances in ICP-MS-Based Nanoparticle Characterization: Techniques and Challenges in Biological Sample Analysis.Journal of separation science · 2025Pooled it
- Deciphering the formation of biogenic nanoparticles and their protein corona: State-of-the-art and analytical challenges.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Comparative study of extraction methods of silver species from faeces of animals fed with silver-based nanomaterials.Mikrochimica acta · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The widespread use and increased exposure of nanoparticles call for technology to quantify their concentration and size distribution in biological matrices. As ex situ evaluation, facile extraction with high fidelity and efficiency is critical. In this work, single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (spICP-MS) was used for nanoparticle number and distribution analysis, where a facile and highly efficient mechanically assisted alkaline digestion has been developed to extract nanoparticles at low alkali concentration. The optimization was performed using chicken tissues in vitro mixed with 30 nm gold nanoparticles, mixture of 30 nm and 60 nm gold nanoparticles, and 45 nm silver nanoparticles, respectively, which is, then, mechanically ground to form tissue homogenate and 2% TMAH is added. The nanoparticles are extracted with a recovery of more than 94% for all the spiked nanoparticle tissue samples. The extraction method has also been attempted to be applied to extract single-sized gold nanoparticles from various organs of mice mixed in vivo with the nanoparticles through intravenous injection, and led to consistent results with acid digestion. Mice injected intravenously with double-sized gold nanoparticle mixture were also studied, further showing that gold nanoparticles of 30 nm and 60 nm have no significant difference in their biodistribution in the same organ. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt for multiple nanoparticles being extracted simultaneously and measured quantitatively from various organs, such as the heart, liver, spleen, lungs, and kidneys. We believe this method is beneficial to the safety assessment and toxicokinetics studies for nanoparticles in tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35175388What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.