Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35175384›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2022

Financing Pediatric Surgery: A Provider's Perspective from the Global Initiative for Children's Surgery.

Sarah J Ullrich, Nowrin Tamanna, Tasmiah Tahera Aziz, Godfrey Sama Philipo, Tahmina Banu, Emmanuel A Ameh, Doruk Ozgediz, Global Initiative for Children’s Surgery

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Frugal Innovations in Orthopaedics.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sarah J UllrichDepartment of Surgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, 330 Cedar Street, FMB 107, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA. sarah.ullrich@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4581-3289
Nowrin TamannaDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Chittagong Research Institute for Children Surgery, Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Tasmiah Tahera AzizDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Chittagong Research Institute for Children Surgery, Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Godfrey Sama PhilipoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Tahmina BanuDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Chittagong Research Institute for Children Surgery, Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Emmanuel A AmehDivision of Pediatric Surgery, National Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria.
Doruk OzgedizDivision of Pediatric Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Global Initiative for Children’s Surgery

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHalf the world's population is at risk of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE, out-of-pocket spending of more than 10% of annual expenditure) should they require surgery. Protection against CHE is a key indicator of successful health care delivery and has been identified as a priority area by the Global Initiative for Children's Surgery (GICS). Data specific to pediatric surgical patients is limited. This study examines the financial risks for pediatric surgical patients and their families from a provider's perspective.

methodsWe surveyed GICS members about the existing financial protection mechanisms and estimated expenditures for their patients. Questions were structured based on the National Surgical, Obstetric and Anesthesia Planning Surgical Indicators and finalized based on multi-institutional consensus between high-income country and low-and middle-income country (LMIC) providers. Chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test and student's t-test were used as appropriate.

resultsAmong 107 respondents, 72.4% were from low income or lower-middle income (LIC/LMIC) countries, and 55.1% were attending or consultant physicians. Families were most likely to decline surgery in LIC/LMIC due to inability to afford treatment (mean Likert = 3.77 ± 1.06). The odds of incurring CHE after children's surgery are up to 17 times greater in LIC/LMIC (P = 0.001, unadjusted OR 17.28, 95%CI 2.13-140.02). Over 50% of families of children undergoing major surgery in these settings face CHE. An estimated 5.1% of providers in LIC/LMIC and 56.2% (P < 0.001) of providers in UMIC/HIC reported that families are able to pay for their direct medical costs with the assistance available to them and were more likely to sell assets (74.4% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.005).

conclusionPatients in LMICs are at greater risk for CHE and have less financial risk protection than their HIC counterparts. Given this disparity, intervention is needed to make safe surgery affordable for children worldwide.

Indexed as

Specialties, SurgicalChildHealth ExpendituresHumansIncomePovertySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.