Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35175340›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Feasibility of Specimen Self-collection in Young Children Undergoing SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance for In-Person Learning.

Jonathan Altamirano, Marcela Lopez, India G Robinson, Leanne X Chun, Grace K-Y Tam, Nuzhat J Shaikh, Elisabeth G Hoyte, Yuan Jin Carrington, Shilpa G Jani, Elizabeth Y Toomarian and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. How much samples do you misdiagnosis with nasal swab?The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan AltamiranoDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Marcela LopezDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
India G RobinsonDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Leanne X ChunDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Grace K-Y TamDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Nuzhat J ShaikhDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Elisabeth G HoyteDivision of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Yuan Jin CarringtonDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Shilpa G JaniCenter for Policy, Outcomes, and Prevention, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Elizabeth Y ToomarianGraduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Julianna C HsingDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Jasmin MaCenter for Policy, Outcomes, and Prevention, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Uma PulendranCenter for Policy, Outcomes, and Prevention, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Prasanthi GovindarajanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Andra L BlomkalnsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Benjamin A PinskyDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
C Jason WangCenter for Policy, Outcomes, and Prevention, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Yvonne MaldonadoDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Stanford University · USSynapse Biomedical (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: There is an urgent need to assess the feasibility of COVID-19 surveillance measures in educational settings. Objective: To assess whether young children can feasibly self-collect SARS-CoV-2 samples for surveillance testing over the course of an academic year. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective pilot cohort study was conducted from September 10, 2020, to June 10, 2021, at a K-8 school in San Mateo County, California. The research consisted of quantitative data collection efforts: (1) demographic data collected, (2) student sample self-collection error rates, and (3) student sample self-collection time durations. Students were enrolled in a hybrid learning model, a teaching model in which students were taught in person and online, with students having the option to attend virtually as needed. Data were collected under waiver of consent from students participating in weekly SARS-CoV-2 testing. Main Outcomes and Measures: Errors over time for self-collection of nasal swabs such as contaminated swabs and inadequate or shallow swabbing; time taken for sample collection. Results: Of 296 participants, 148 (50.0%) were boys and 148 (50.0%) were girls. A total of 87 participants (29.2%) identified as Asian; 2 (0.6%), Black or African American; 13 (4.4%), Hispanic/Latinx; 103 (34.6%), non-Hispanic White; 87 (29.2%), multiracial; and 6 (2.0%), other. The median school grade was fourth grade. From September 2020 to March 2021, a total of 4203 samples were obtained from 221 students on a weekly basis, while data on error rates were collected. Errors occurred in 2.7% (n = 107; 95% CI, 2.2%-3.2%) of student encounters, with the highest rate occurring on the first day of testing (20 [10.2%]). There was an overall decrease in error rates over time. From April to June 2021, a total of 2021 samples were obtained from 296 students on a weekly basis while data on encounter lengths were collected. Between April and June 2021, 193 encounters were timed. The mean duration of each encounter was 70 seconds (95% CI, 66.4-73.7 seconds). Conclusions and Relevance: Mastery of self-collected lower nasal swabs is possible for children 5 years and older. Testing duration can be condensed once students gain proficiency in testing procedures. Scalability for larger schools is possible if consideration is given to the resource-intensive nature of the testing and the setting's weather patterns.

Indexed as

COVID-19 TestingSARS-CoV-2Self-TestingCaliforniaChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesCOVID-19EpidemicsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePopulation SurveillanceProspective StudiesSpecimen Handling

Identifiers

PMID35175340
PMCPMC8855233
OpenAlexW4213359143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.