Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35174735›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2022

Developing Peri-Operative Rehabilitation in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [AO Spine RECODE-DCM Research Priority Number 6]: An Unexplored Opportunity?

Timothy F Boerger, Allison S Hyngstrom, Julio C Furlan, Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan, Armin Curt, Brian K Kwon, Shekar N Kurpad, Michael G Fehlings, James S Harrop, Bizhan Aarabi and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Rehabilitation strategies following posterior cervical decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a narrative review and framework for clinical practice.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 6 countries.

Timothy F BoergerDepartment of Neurosurgery, 5506Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1587-3704
Allison S HyngstromDepartment of Physical Therapy, 5505Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Julio C FurlanKITE Research Institute, 7989University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2038-0018
Sukhvinder Kalsi-RyanKITE Research Institute, 7989University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Armin CurtUniversity Spine Center, 31031Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Brian K KwonDepartment of Orthopedics, Vancouver Spine Surgery Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Shekar N KurpadDepartment of Neurosurgery, 5506Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Michael G FehlingsDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5722-6364
James S HarropDepartment of Neurological Surgery, 6559Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Bizhan AarabiDepartment of Neurosurgery, 1479University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Vafa Rahimi-MovagharDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, 48439Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
James D GuestDepartment of Neurosurgery and The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, The Miller School of Medicine, 12235University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Jefferson R WilsonDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5965-0305
Benjamin M DaviesDepartment of Neurosurgery, 2152University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0591-5069
Mark R N KotterDepartment of Neurosurgery, 2152University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Paul A KoljonenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, 25809The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9250-653X
Medical College of Wisconsin · USUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Toronto · CAMarquette University · USSina Hospital · IRThomas Jefferson University · USUniversitätsklinik Balgrist · CHUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Hong Kong · HKUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designNarrative review.

objectiveDegenerative cervical myelopathy is one of the most frequent impairments of the spinal cord encountered internationally in adults. Currently, surgical decompression is the recommended treatment for people with DCM (PwCM) presenting with moderate to severe symptoms or neurological deficits. However, despite surgical intervention, not all patients make a complete recovery due to the irreversible tissue damage within the spinal cord. The objective of this review is to describe the state and gaps in the current literature on rehabilitation for PwCM and possible innovative rehabilitation strategies.

methodsLiterature search.

resultsIn other neurological disorders such as stroke and acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), timely and strategic rehabilitation has been shown to be indispensable for maximizing functional outcomes, and it is imperative that appropriate perioperative rehabilitative interventions accompany surgical approaches in order to enable the best outcomes. In this review, the current state of knowledge regarding rehabilitation for PwCM is described. Additionally, various therapies that have shown to improve outcomes in comparable neurological conditions such as stroke and SCI which may be translated to DCM will be reviewed.

conclusionsWe conclude that locomotor training and arm/hand therapy may benefit PwCM. Further, we conclude that body weight support, robotic assistance, and virtual/augmented reality therapies may be beneficial therapeutic analogs to locomotor and hand therapies.

Indexed as

body weight supportcervicalgaithandmyelopathyrehabilitationspondylosistherapyvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID35174735
PMCPMC8859699
OpenAlexW4212929932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.