Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35174728›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2022

A New Framework for Investigating the Biological Basis of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [AO Spine RECODE-DCM Research Priority Number 5]: Mechanical Stress, Vulnerability and Time.

Benjamin M Davies, Oliver Mowforth, Aref-Ali Gharooni, Lindsay Tetreault, Aria Nouri, Rana S Dhillon, Josef Bednarik, Allan R Martin, Adam Young, Hitoshi Takahashi and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Impact of hypertension in diabetes on surgical outcomes after cervical laminoplasty - a retrospective, multi-institutional study of 1002 patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Benjamin M DaviesDepartment of Neurosurgery, 2152University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0591-5069
Oliver MowforthDepartment of Neurosurgery, 2152University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6788-745X
Aref-Ali GharooniDepartment of Neurosurgery, 2152University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6705-1115
Lindsay TetreaultNew York University, Langone Health, Graduate Medical Education, 5894Department of Neurology, New York, NY, USA.
Aria NouriDivision of Neurosurgery, Geneva University Hospitals, 27230University of Geneva, Genève, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4965-3059
Rana S DhillonDepartment of Neurosurgery, 60078St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.
Josef BednarikDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, 37748Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7420-2383
Allan R MartinDepartment of Neurosurgery, 8789University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Adam YoungDepartment of Neurosurgery, 2152University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Hitoshi TakahashiDepartment of Pathology, Brain Research Institute, 12978Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.
Timothy F BoergerDepartment of Neurosurgery, 5506Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1587-3704
Virginia Fj NewcombeDivision of Anaesthesia, Department of Medicine, 2152University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Carl Moritz ZipserUniversity Spine Center, 31031Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Patrick FreundUniversity Spine Center, 31031Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Paul Aarne KoljonenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, 25809The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9250-653X
Ricardo Rodrigues-PintoSpinal Unit (UVM), Department of Orthopaedics, 112085Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto - Hospital de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6903-348X
Vafa Rahimi-MovagharDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, 48439Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Jefferson R WilsonDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5965-0305
Shekar N KurpadDepartment of Neurosurgery, 5506Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI, USA.
Michael G FehlingsDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, 7938University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5722-6364
Brian K KwonVancouver Spine Surgery Institute, Department of Orthopedics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
James S HarropDepartment of Neurological Surgery, 6559Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
James D GuestDepartment of Neurosurgery and the Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, The Miller School of Medicine, 12235University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Armin CurtUniversity Spine Center, 31031Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Mark R N KotterDepartment of Neurosurgery, 2152University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designLiterature Review (Narrative).

objectiveTo propose a new framework, to support the investigation and understanding of the pathobiology of DCM, AO Spine RECODE-DCM research priority number 5.

methodsDegenerative cervical myelopathy is a common and disabling spinal cord disorder. In this perspective, we review key knowledge gaps between the clinical phenotype and our biological models. We then propose a reappraisal of the key driving forces behind DCM and an individual's susceptibility, including the proposal of a new framework.

resultsPresent pathobiological and mechanistic knowledge does not adequately explain the disease phenotype; why only a subset of patients with visualized cord compression show clinical myelopathy, and the amount of cord compression only weakly correlates with disability. We propose that DCM is better represented as a function of several interacting mechanical forces, such as shear, tension and compression, alongside an individual's vulnerability to spinal cord injury, influenced by factors such as age, genetics, their cardiovascular, gastrointestinal and nervous system status, and time.

conclusionUnderstanding the disease pathobiology is a fundamental research priority. We believe a framework of mechanical stress, vulnerability, and time may better represent the disease as a whole. Whilst this remains theoretical, we hope that at the very least it will inspire new avenues of research that better encapsulate the full spectrum of disease.

Indexed as

cervicaldegenerationdisabilitydisc herniationmyelopathyossification posterior longitudinal ligamentquestionnairerecoveryspondylosisspondyloticstenosis

Identifiers

PMID35174728
PMCPMC8859710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.